Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-14 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 06:29:32AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > Right you are, both of you. I guess was confusing 'route' with > 'interface' and didn't think of using multiple routes like that. It > would be a kludge but whatever gets the job done.. Another idea: What about making it an

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-14 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 06:29:32AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: Right you are, both of you. I guess was confusing 'route' with 'interface' and didn't think of using multiple routes like that. It would be a kludge but whatever gets the job done.. Another idea: What about making it an

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
> If this is done, I recommend we immediately mark it as deprecated and likely > to go away soon. It's better to get people to upgrade their IOS than to > force kludges. If they have an old IOS, this is probably one of several > issues that need fixing. I have no hope of Linuxtoday fixing

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread David Ford
If this is done, I recommend we immediately mark it as deprecated and likely to go away soon. It's better to get people to upgrade their IOS than to force kludges. If they have an old IOS, this is probably one of several issues that need fixing. -d Mike Jagdis wrote: > > Right you are, both

RE: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Mike Jagdis
> Right you are, both of you. I guess was confusing 'route' with > 'interface' and didn't think of using multiple routes like that. It > would be a kludge but whatever gets the job done.. No more than some of the other route attributes like window, rtt, mtu, ssthresh etc.

RE: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Mike Jagdis
> [Mike Jagdis] > > Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? > > Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- > connected routes are the ones where you could derive the most benefit > from ECN -- and those same routes are where you are likely

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Craig Schlenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > but you could add a host route for say linuxtoday with the NO_ECN > flag (also pointing at the default route), right? [Jan Niehusmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > If it is configurable per route (and not per interface), it may help, > as you could add

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:32:32AM +, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? > > Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- If it is configurable per route (and not per interface), it may help, as you

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
> > More with their firewall. But try > > > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn [Mike Jagdis] > Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- connected routes are the ones where you could derive

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
More with their firewall. But try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn [Mike Jagdis] Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- connected routes are the ones where you could derive the most

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:32:32AM +, Peter Samuelson wrote: Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- If it is configurable per route (and not per interface), it may help, as you could

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Craig Schlenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]] but you could add a host route for say linuxtoday with the NO_ECN flag (also pointing at the default route), right? [Jan Niehusmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]] If it is configurable per route (and not per interface), it may help, as you could add additional routes

RE: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Mike Jagdis
[Mike Jagdis] Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- connected routes are the ones where you could derive the most benefit from ECN -- and those same routes are where you are likely to find

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread David Ford
If this is done, I recommend we immediately mark it as deprecated and likely to go away soon. It's better to get people to upgrade their IOS than to force kludges. If they have an old IOS, this is probably one of several issues that need fixing. -d Mike Jagdis wrote: Right you are, both of

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
If this is done, I recommend we immediately mark it as deprecated and likely to go away soon. It's better to get people to upgrade their IOS than to force kludges. If they have an old IOS, this is probably one of several issues that need fixing. I have no hope of Linuxtoday fixing this.

RE: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-05 Thread Mike Jagdis
> More with their firewall. But try > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

RE: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-05 Thread Mike Jagdis
More with their firewall. But try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-04 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:34:18AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Is there something wrong with the tcp stack? > > More with their firewall. But try > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn Wow. I suddenly can access lots of hosts again. And we

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:34:18AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Is there something wrong with the tcp stack? More with their firewall. But try echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-04 Thread Christoph Lameter
Is there something wrong with the tcp stack? bash-2.04$ ping linuxtoday.com PING linuxtoday.com (63.236.72.248) from 216.59.82.89 : 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 63.236.72.248: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=103.7 ms 64 bytes from 63.236.72.248: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=104.3 ms --- linuxtoday.com ping

cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-04 Thread Christoph Lameter
Is there something wrong with the tcp stack? bash-2.04$ ping linuxtoday.com PING linuxtoday.com (63.236.72.248) from 216.59.82.89 : 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 63.236.72.248: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=103.7 ms 64 bytes from 63.236.72.248: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=104.3 ms --- linuxtoday.com ping

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:34:18AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: Is there something wrong with the tcp stack? More with their firewall. But try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to