Re: clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-10 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31:46AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk > > > should be an opaque handle, not a value that

Re: clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-10 Thread Julia Lawall
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk > > should be an opaque handle, not a value that can be dereferenced: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/20/105 > >

Re: clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-10 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk > should be an opaque handle, not a value that can be dereferenced: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/20/105 > > There is such a dereference in

Re: clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-10 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk should be an opaque handle, not a value that can be dereferenced: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/20/105 There is such a dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c,

Re: clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-10 Thread Julia Lawall
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk should be an opaque handle, not a value that can be dereferenced: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/20/105 There is

Re: clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-10 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31:46AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk should be an opaque handle, not a value that can be

clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-03 Thread Julia Lawall
There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk should be an opaque handle, not a value that can be dereferenced: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/20/105 There is such a dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c, in the function sh_cpufreq_cpu_init: freq_table = cpuclk->nr_freqs

clk dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c

2013-01-03 Thread Julia Lawall
There has been a discussion recently about how the result of get_clk should be an opaque handle, not a value that can be dereferenced: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/20/105 There is such a dereference in arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c, in the function sh_cpufreq_cpu_init: freq_table = cpuclk-nr_freqs