Hi,
I am on a 2.6.23.11 on a AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+.
When I do a sysrq-t, after the dump of task state (that is quite slow
because of the vesa console framebuffer), I got the message
"Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 28115415756 ns)
Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been inst
Hi,
I am on a 2.6.23.11 on a AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+.
When I do a sysrq-t, after the dump of task state (that is quite slow
because of the vesa console framebuffer), I got the message
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 28115415756 ns)
Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been installed
On Jul 9 2007 22:54, Pawel Dziepak wrote:
> As far as i know Pentium M processors have dynamically changed clock
> speed (ofc to save power). That's why kernel notice that TSC is
> unstable (it is indeed). On my Athlon 64 I have similar situation,
> because CPU frequency is dynamically changed.
>
On Jul 9 2007 22:54, Pawel Dziepak wrote:
As far as i know Pentium M processors have dynamically changed clock
speed (ofc to save power). That's why kernel notice that TSC is
unstable (it is indeed). On my Athlon 64 I have similar situation,
because CPU frequency is dynamically changed.
I
Now that you mention it - I am seeing something similar with
kernel 2.6.22 on an Intel Pentium D 940 dual core processor
(arbitrary selection of dmesg lines that appeared relevant):
<5>[0.00] Linux version 2.6.22-testing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE
As far as i know Pentium M processors have dynamically changed clock
speed (ofc to save power). That's why kernel notice that TSC is
unstable (it is indeed). On my Athlon 64 I have similar situation,
because CPU frequency is dynamically changed.
I don't think that there is an easy way to fix it
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Renato S. Yamane wrote:
On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
It's normal?
AMD CPU? SMP? Details, please.
Oh, sorry!
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family
On Monday 09 of July 2007, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Renato S. Yamane wrote:
> > On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
> > Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
> >
> > It's normal?
>
> AMD CPU? SMP? Details, please.
Here (after re
Renato S. Yamane wrote:
On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
It's normal?
AMD CPU? SMP? Details, please.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
It's normal?
Regards,
Renato
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.
On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
It's normal?
Regards,
Renato
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
Renato S. Yamane wrote:
On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
It's normal?
AMD CPU? SMP? Details, please.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Monday 09 of July 2007, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Renato S. Yamane wrote:
On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
It's normal?
AMD CPU? SMP? Details, please.
Here (after resume from ram btw):
[ 10.726665] Marking TSC
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Renato S. Yamane wrote:
On Kernel 2.6.21.6 I see this message in dmesg:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 732182695 ns)
It's normal?
AMD CPU? SMP? Details, please.
Oh, sorry!
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family
As far as i know Pentium M processors have dynamically changed clock
speed (ofc to save power). That's why kernel notice that TSC is
unstable (it is indeed). On my Athlon 64 I have similar situation,
because CPU frequency is dynamically changed.
I don't think that there is an easy way to fix it
Now that you mention it - I am seeing something similar with
kernel 2.6.22 on an Intel Pentium D 940 dual core processor
(arbitrary selection of dmesg lines that appeared relevant):
5[0.00] Linux version 2.6.22-testing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:41:45PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I got this message after suspend;resume on my notebook
> Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -154983451 ns)
>
I am getting the exact same line on bootup on my Fujitsu Siemens
Lifebook E8110. After that line
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:41:45PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Hi.
I got this message after suspend;resume on my notebook
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -154983451 ns)
I am getting the exact same line on bootup on my Fujitsu Siemens
Lifebook E8110. After that line the boot halts
Hi.
I got this message after suspend;resume on my notebook
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -154983451 ns)
What other info should I post, who should I Cc?
regards,
--
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby
Hi.
I got this message after suspend;resume on my notebook
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -154983451 ns)
What other info should I post, who should I Cc?
regards,
--
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby
20 matches
Mail list logo
