Re: cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-21 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote: > > > From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? > > 2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke > several USB drivers, includ

Re: cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-21 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote: From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? 2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke several USB drivers, including cpia USB. Should be fixe

RE: cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-20 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? 2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke several USB drivers,

cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-20 Thread John M. Flinchbaugh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? the last i remember using my webcam was toward the end of august. it hasn't been working with test9 or test8 i don't think. the device shows up just fine, the /proc/cpia/video0

cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-20 Thread John M. Flinchbaugh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? the last i remember using my webcam was toward the end of august. it hasn't been working with test9 or test8 i don't think. the device shows up just fine, the /proc/cpia/video0

RE: cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-20 Thread Dunlap, Randy
From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? 2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke several USB drivers, including cpia USB. Should