Paul Jackson writes:
> ... however ... question for Paul M. ... what version of gcc did this fail
> on?
The gcc-4.0.2 in Debian/ppc sid, which is biarch.
> I finally got my crosstools setup working for me again, and building
> a powerpc64 using gcc-3.4.0 on my Intel PC box does _not_ fail.
A day or two ago, Paul M. wrote:
> Compiling -rc7 for ppc64 using pSeries_defconfig I get this compile
> error:
Not that the following really matters ... I've already sent in a fix,
based on your analysis, followed by Nick's suggestion that we don't do
it this way anyway.
... however ...
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is
Thank-you for reporting this. Likely the best way to fix this for now,
since we are late in a release (Linus will probably want to wack me
upside the head for breaking his build ;) is to leave the
node_to_cpumask and
Paul Mackerras wrote:
I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is
Thank-you for reporting this. Likely the best way to fix this for now,
since we are late in a release (Linus will probably want to wack me
upside the head for breaking his build ;) is to leave the
node_to_cpumask and
A day or two ago, Paul M. wrote:
Compiling -rc7 for ppc64 using pSeries_defconfig I get this compile
error:
Not that the following really matters ... I've already sent in a fix,
based on your analysis, followed by Nick's suggestion that we don't do
it this way anyway.
... however ... question
Paul Jackson writes:
... however ... question for Paul M. ... what version of gcc did this fail
on?
The gcc-4.0.2 in Debian/ppc sid, which is biarch.
I finally got my crosstools setup working for me again, and building
a powerpc64 using gcc-3.4.0 on my Intel PC box does _not_ fail. That
6 matches
Mail list logo
