Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-29 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:26:24 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 28 2007 15:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, > >> about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. > >>

Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-29 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Aug 28 2007 15:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, >> about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. >> >> Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the requested rate but >> assuming that the CPU

Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-29 Thread DervishD
Hi Stephen :) * Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:51:55 +0200 DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very > > slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the > > problem:

Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-29 Thread DervishD
Hi Stephen :) * Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:51:55 +0200 DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq.

Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-29 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Aug 28 2007 15:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote: I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the requested rate but assuming that the CPU is

Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-29 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:26:24 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 28 2007 15:23, Stephen Hemminger wrote: I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. Looks

Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:51:55 +0200 DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all :) > > I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, > about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. > > Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the

cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-28 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the requested rate but assuming that the CPU is running at its default clock or something

cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-28 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the requested rate but assuming that the CPU is running at its default clock or something

Re: cpufreq affects traffic control rates

2007-08-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:51:55 +0200 DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all :) I noticed lately that my traffic control rates were being very slow, about 40% less than expected, and finally spotted the problem: cpufreq. Looks like HTB puts buckets according to the requested