On Tuesday 21 June 2016 03:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:28:56AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 June 2016 01:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter
On Tuesday 21 June 2016 03:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:28:56AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Tuesday 21 June 2016 01:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:45:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Should arc-*-* list gdb in their noconfigdirs like many other archs do
> too?
Something like so I suppose.
---
configure.ac |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:45:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Should arc-*-* list gdb in their noconfigdirs like many other archs do
> too?
Something like so I suppose.
---
configure.ac |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:28:56AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2016 01:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >> > On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> > > As you can see, arc doesn't even build
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:28:56AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2016 01:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >> > On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> > > As you can see, arc doesn't even build
On Tuesday 21 June 2016 01:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> > On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> > > As you can see, arc doesn't even build upstream binutils :/
>>> > > (binutils-2_26-branch as of today).
>> >
On Tuesday 21 June 2016 01:13 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> > On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> > > As you can see, arc doesn't even build upstream binutils :/
>>> > > (binutils-2_26-branch as of today).
>> >
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > As you can see, arc doesn't even build upstream binutils :/
> > (binutils-2_26-branch as of today).
>
> Hmm - we are still in fight w.r.t. upstreaming gcc fully (ARCv2 gcc
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:29:28AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > As you can see, arc doesn't even build upstream binutils :/
> > (binutils-2_26-branch as of today).
>
> Hmm - we are still in fight w.r.t. upstreaming gcc fully (ARCv2 gcc
On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> As you can see, arc doesn't even build upstream binutils :/
> (binutils-2_26-branch as of today).
Hmm - we are still in fight w.r.t. upstreaming gcc fully (ARCv2 gcc support)
although ARCompact has been there for some time. binutils
On Saturday 18 June 2016 03:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> As you can see, arc doesn't even build upstream binutils :/
> (binutils-2_26-branch as of today).
Hmm - we are still in fight w.r.t. upstreaming gcc fully (ARCv2 gcc support)
although ARCompact has been there for some time. binutils
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:05:01AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I use segher's buildall script.
> The buildall script I put to work and after about an hour I have however
> many of the 20+ targets that build with gcc.git and binutils.git cross
> compilers.
>
Like the below...
(the native
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:05:01AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I use segher's buildall script.
> The buildall script I put to work and after about an hour I have however
> many of the 20+ targets that build with gcc.git and binutils.git cross
> compilers.
>
Like the below...
(the native
14 matches
Mail list logo
