Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Daniel Vetter schreef op ma 14-07-2014 om 09:18 [+0200]: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > index

Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-07-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Please test the below patch, thanks. > > -Daniel > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index

Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Please test the below patch, thanks. > -Daniel > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 82e7d57f0a8a..f0be855ddf45 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++

Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-07-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]: > > On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A > > > bisect result would be awesome. > > The

Re: drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-07-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]: On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A bisect result would be awesome. The bisect

Re: drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: Please test the below patch, thanks. -Daniel diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 82e7d57f0a8a..f0be855ddf45 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++

Re: drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-07-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: Please test the below patch, thanks. -Daniel diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 82e7d57f0a8a..f0be855ddf45

Re: drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Daniel Vetter schreef op ma 14-07-2014 om 09:18 [+0200]: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index

Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-07-13 Thread Paul Bolle
Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]: > On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A > > bisect result would be awesome. The bisect (which took me quite some time) points at commit 98ec77397a5c

Re: drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-07-13 Thread Paul Bolle
Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]: On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A bisect result would be awesome. The bisect (which took me quite some time) points at commit 98ec77397a5c

Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-07-02 Thread Paul Bolle
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A > bisect result would be awesome. Too bad. Unless someone else has a better idea I hope to start bisecting one of these days (that might take quite some time,

Re: drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-07-02 Thread Paul Bolle
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A bisect result would be awesome. Too bad. Unless someone else has a better idea I hope to start bisecting one of these days (that might take quite some time, especially

Re: drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-07-01 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > Kernels v3.16-rc2 and v3.16-rc3 trigger a new (for me) warning. (I never > booted v3.16-rc1). Machine is a, rather outdated, ThinkPad X41 (ie, > single core i686). > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1274 >

Re: drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-07-01 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: Kernels v3.16-rc2 and v3.16-rc3 trigger a new (for me) warning. (I never booted v3.16-rc1). Machine is a, rather outdated, ThinkPad X41 (ie, single core i686). WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1274

drm: i915: "plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active"

2014-06-30 Thread Paul Bolle
Kernels v3.16-rc2 and v3.16-rc3 trigger a new (for me) warning. (I never booted v3.16-rc1). Machine is a, rather outdated, ThinkPad X41 (ie, single core i686). WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1274 assert_planes_disabled+0xf9/0x100 [i915]() plane B assertion

drm: i915: plane B assertion failure, should be off on pipe B but is still active

2014-06-30 Thread Paul Bolle
Kernels v3.16-rc2 and v3.16-rc3 trigger a new (for me) warning. (I never booted v3.16-rc1). Machine is a, rather outdated, ThinkPad X41 (ie, single core i686). WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 221 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1274 assert_planes_disabled+0xf9/0x100 [i915]() plane B assertion