Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Robert Hancock wrote: Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Ayaz --- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Ayaz --- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Ayaz --- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Robert Hancock wrote: Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Ayaz --- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Tobias Diedrich wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Tobias Diedrich wrote: > > >Tobias Diedrich wrote: > > >>Ayaz Abdulla wrote: > > >>>For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. > > >>Will try. > > > > > >Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right?

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Tobias Diedrich wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Tobias Diedrich wrote: Tobias Diedrich wrote: Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Will try. Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? It probably needs to

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Jeff Garzik wrote: > Tobias Diedrich wrote: > >Tobias Diedrich wrote: > >>Ayaz Abdulla wrote: > >>>For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. > >>Will try. > > > >Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? > > It probably needs to be top of

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Jeff Garzik wrote: Tobias Diedrich wrote: Tobias Diedrich wrote: Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Will try. Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? It probably needs to be top of 2.6.20-git-latest or

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Ayaz Seems to solve the problem for me (not heavily tested, but certainly isn't totally dead as it was before). -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Tobias Diedrich wrote: Tobias Diedrich wrote: Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Will try. Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? It probably needs to be top of 2.6.20-git-latest or 2.6.20-rc6-mm3. IOW,

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Tobias Diedrich wrote: > Ayaz Abdulla wrote: > > For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. > > Will try. Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? --- linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/forcedeth.c.orig 2007-02-09 13:02:02.0 +0100 +++

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Ayaz Abdulla wrote: > For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Will try. I reverted to 2.6.19 w/o suspend/resume patch last weekend to make sure on 2.6.19 forcedeth is stable and noticed something odd: Because I didn't include the suspend/resume patch I obviously

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Will try. I reverted to 2.6.19 w/o suspend/resume patch last weekend to make sure on 2.6.19 forcedeth is stable and noticed something odd: Because I didn't include the suspend/resume patch I obviously

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Tobias Diedrich wrote: Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Will try. Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? --- linux-2.6.20/drivers/net/forcedeth.c.orig 2007-02-09 13:02:02.0 +0100 +++

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Tobias Diedrich wrote: Tobias Diedrich wrote: Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Will try. Does not apply cleanly against 2.6.20, is this one fixed up right? It probably needs to be top of 2.6.20-git-latest or 2.6.20-rc6-mm3. IOW,

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Ayaz Abdulla wrote: For all those who are having issues, please try out the attached patch. Ayaz Seems to solve the problem for me (not heavily tested, but certainly isn't totally dead as it was before). -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove nospam from [EMAIL

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

David Ford wrote: On 2/5/07, *Andrew Morton* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:48:33 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

David Ford wrote: On 2/5/07, *Andrew Morton* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:48:33 -0600 Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:52:24 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:35:06 -0600 > Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: > > > > > >> Something's busted with forcedeth in

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:52:24 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:35:06 -0600 Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Barkalow wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:35:06 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: > > > >> Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to > >> 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Daniel Barkalow wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried reverting all the -mm

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Daniel Barkalow wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried reverting all the -mm

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:35:06 -0600 Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Barkalow wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: > Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to > 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get > received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried reverting all the > -mm changes to

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:48:33 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to > >> 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to > 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get > received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried

forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried reverting all the -mm changes to drivers/net/forcedeth.c, which didn't help. The network

forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried reverting all the -mm changes to drivers/net/forcedeth.c, which didn't help. The network

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried reverting

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP address.

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:48:33 -0600 Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but

Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote: Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried reverting all the -mm changes to