On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
>> Said that, I'm not sure why mount_pseudo() would be returning any errors;
>> rejection should happen in the caller (due to MS_NOUSER in the flags), but
>> I don't understand what would tr
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
AFAICS, it's been introduced in commit 3684aa7099e0ab1038a1a1bf717ae60ffc3018d1
Author: Shaohua Li
Date: Mon Feb 22 15:27:40 2016 -0700
block-dev: enable writeback cgroup support
See if you can reproduce it after the following
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Said that, I'm not sure why mount_pseudo() would be returning any errors;
> rejection should happen in the caller (due to MS_NOUSER in the flags), but
> I don't understand what would trigger it on mount_pseudo() level...
I see what's goin
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following program triggers GPF in bd_mount:
>
>
> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> int
Hello,
The following program triggers GPF in bd_mount:
// autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
int fd;
unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER);
unshare(CLONE_NEWNS);
mkdir("./bus", 0662515705056234013740
5 matches
Mail list logo