Hi Toralf,
> I'm wondering why the build failure wasn't fixed by a patch like this:
>
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
> index 5ccea5f..85416bb 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
> @@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ static inline void
Hello,
I'm wondering why the build failure wasn't fixed by a patch like this:
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
index 5ccea5f..85416bb 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ static inline void hci_sock_cmsg(struct
Hello,
I'm wondering why the build failure wasn't fixed by a patch like this:
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
index 5ccea5f..85416bb 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ static inline void hci_sock_cmsg(struct
Hi Toralf,
I'm wondering why the build failure wasn't fixed by a patch like this:
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
index 5ccea5f..85416bb 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ static inline void
Hi Dave,
> > It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
> > current tree.)
> >
> > Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
>
> I'll push the following fix to Linus.
the patch looks absolutely fine to me. You can put an Acked-by line to
Coly Li 写道:
> David Miller 写道:
>> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:02:53 -0700
>>
>>> It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
>>> current tree.)
>>>
>>> Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
>> I'll push the
David Miller 写道:
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:02:53 -0700
>
>> It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
>> current tree.)
>>
>> Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
>
> I'll push the following fix to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
> >
> > hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
> > guess).
> >
> > find the error message and the config
From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:07:26 -0700
> No, this is worse, i386 doesn't have a compat_timeval structure defined,
> nor does any other 32 bit platform.
>
> Marcel, I think you need to use a different structure, care to fix this
> up?
Ok, then see the patch I
From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:02:53 -0700
> It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
> current tree.)
>
> Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
I'll push the following fix to Linus.
>From
From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:04:07 -0700
> It was 767c5eb5d35aeb85987143f0a730bc21d3ecfb3d that caused it. It
> needs a .h file added to the file, patch forthcoming...
Ok, I though it was a CONFIG_COMPAT ifdef issue, feel
free to push the header include fix.
-
To
12 Eyl 2007 Çar tarihinde, Greg KH şunları yazmıştı:
> No, this is worse, i386 doesn't have a compat_timeval structure defined,
> nor does any other 32 bit platform.
>
> Marcel, I think you need to use a different structure, care to fix this
> up?
I sent a patch for this problem about ~4 hours
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:04:07AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:02:53AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
> > >
> > > hci_sock.c fails to build because it
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:02:53AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
> >
> > hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
> > guess).
> >
> > find the error
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
>
> hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
> guess).
>
> find the error message and the config attached.
It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies
Hi,
I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
guess).
find the error message and the config attached.
regards,
Andre
LD net/ax25/ax25.o
LD net/ax25/built-in.o
CHECK net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
CC
Coly Li 写道:
David Miller 写道:
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:02:53 -0700
It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
current tree.)
Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
I'll push the following fix to
Hi Dave,
It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
current tree.)
Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
I'll push the following fix to Linus.
the patch looks absolutely fine to me. You can put an Acked-by line to
it. Sorry
Hi,
I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
guess).
find the error message and the config attached.
regards,
Andre
LD net/ax25/ax25.o
LD net/ax25/built-in.o
CHECK net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
CC
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
Hi,
I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
guess).
find the error message and the config attached.
It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:02:53AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
Hi,
I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
guess).
find the error message and the config
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:04:07AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 05:02:53AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
Hi,
I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:02:53 -0700
It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
current tree.)
Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
I'll push the following fix to Linus.
From
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:04:07 -0700
It was 767c5eb5d35aeb85987143f0a730bc21d3ecfb3d that caused it. It
needs a .h file added to the file, patch forthcoming...
Ok, I though it was a CONFIG_COMPAT ifdef issue, feel
free to push the header include fix.
-
To
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:07:26 -0700
No, this is worse, i386 doesn't have a compat_timeval structure defined,
nor does any other 32 bit platform.
Marcel, I think you need to use a different structure, care to fix this
up?
Ok, then see the patch I posted
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
Hi,
I did a make randconfig and then make C=1.
hci_sock.c fails to build because it doesnt know compat_timeval (i
guess).
find the error message and the config attached.
It's not
David Miller 写道:
From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:02:53 -0700
It's not even a randconfig issue, my build dies too (this is Linus's
current tree.)
Time to poke through the 10 bluetooth patches that were just added...
I'll push the following fix to Linus.
From
27 matches
Mail list logo
