> Is this reproducible? If so, could you please try bisection?
Yes. This issue is reproducible.
I will run bisection and get back to you (might take some time).
- Naresh
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 04:18:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your inputs.
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 21:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:40:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > Linux Kernel Functional Testing (LKFT) started running
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your inputs.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 21:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:40:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Linux Kernel Functional Testing (LKFT) started running rcu-torture tests on
> > qemu_arm64, qemu_arm qemu_x86_64 and qemu_i386 from our
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:40:04PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Linux Kernel Functional Testing (LKFT) started running rcu-torture tests on
> qemu_arm64, qemu_arm qemu_x86_64 and qemu_i386 from our CI build systems.
>
> The following warning(s) noticed on qemu_i386 while running rcu-torture
Linux Kernel Functional Testing (LKFT) started running rcu-torture tests on
qemu_arm64, qemu_arm qemu_x86_64 and qemu_i386 from our CI build systems.
The following warning(s) noticed on qemu_i386 while running rcu-torture test
on Linux mainline and Linux -next master branch. Since we do not have
5 matches
Mail list logo