Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-18 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 18 December 2006 10:45, Stefan Richter wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Sunday 17 December 2006 20:05, Stefan Richter wrote: >>>What's missing in our implementation is that the use count of ohci1394 >>>goes up too once a "high-level driver" uses resources of a host driven >>>by ohci1394.

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-18 Thread Stefan Richter
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 17 December 2006 20:05, Stefan Richter wrote: >>What's missing in our implementation is that the use count of ohci1394 >>goes up too once a "high-level driver" uses resources of a host driven >>by ohci1394. > > This needs some tlc then I assume? Yes. It's now logge

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 17 December 2006 20:05, Stefan Richter wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> The camera has been turned back off, but yes, it works absolutely >> normally now. With no dv1394 in memory! >> >> Then with the camera on and kino controlling it: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lsmod|grep 1394 >> raw1394

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Richter
Gene Heskett wrote: > The camera has been turned back off, but yes, it works absolutely normally > now. With no dv1394 in memory! > > Then with the camera on and kino controlling it: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lsmod|grep 1394 > raw139432264 4 > ohci1394 39088 0 > iee

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 17 December 2006 15:21, Stefan Richter wrote: [...] >What if you prevent dv1394 from ever being loaded, or don't build it in >the first place? CONFIG_IEEE1394_DV1394=n How about '# CONFIG_IEEE1394_DV1394 is not set'? Hand edited the .config and fired off my makeit script, which does it

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Richter
(Cc linux1394-devel, for the record) Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 17 December 2006 13:31, Stefan Richter wrote: >> Is your version of kino still using dv1394 or does it work without >> dv1394 loaded too? >> > AFAIK, its kino is 0.9.3. Ok, while kino is running I did a modprobe -rv > dc1394 an

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 17 December 2006 13:31, Stefan Richter wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >... > >> while I didn't try >> to capture a 2 hour movie, I did use kino to control the camera >> playback, rewind etc stuff for about 10 minutes and had no problems >> whatsoever. > >... > >> The only entry in the messag

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-17 Thread Stefan Richter
Gene Heskett wrote: ... > while I didn't try > to capture a 2 hour movie, I did use kino to control the camera playback, > rewind etc stuff for about 10 minutes and had no problems whatsoever. ... > The only entry in the messages log for all this was: > > Dec 17 12:47:13 coyote kernel: WARNING:

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 14 December 2006 22:17, Gene Heskett wrote: >On Thursday 14 December 2006 12:48, Stefan Richter wrote: >[...] > >>(Anyway, that's unrelated to Gene's issues.) > >And which I haven't had a chance to check yet, the camera is still in > the truck and I've been busier than a one legged man

Re: ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 14 December 2006 12:48, Stefan Richter wrote: [...] > >(Anyway, that's unrelated to Gene's issues.) And which I haven't had a chance to check yet, the camera is still in the truck and I've been busier than a one legged man in an ass kicking contest today. I did get 2.6.20-rc1 built

ieee1394 in 2.6.20-rc1 (was Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1)

2006-12-14 Thread Stefan Richter
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 22:32, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> Ok, one not so silly Q (IMO) from the resident old fart. I saw, >>> sometime in the past week, a relatively huge ieee1394 update go by. >>> And I have some issues with t