Am 20.05.2015 um 22:55 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
Hi,
> The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
comments back. The comments are discussed and actioned, and a new
set of patches posted for
Am 20.05.2015 um 15:21 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
Hi,
(Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it broke some other things for me.)
What are the regressions you see?
Trouble w/ emmc/sd suddenly being ro.
Guess, something in with the corresponding APIs changed and I
didn't rebase correctly.
It's now several
Am 20.05.2015 um 22:55 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
Hi,
The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
comments back. The comments are discussed and actioned, and a new
set of patches posted for
Am 20.05.2015 um 15:21 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
Hi,
(Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it broke some other things for me.)
What are the regressions you see?
Trouble w/ emmc/sd suddenly being ro.
Guess, something in with the corresponding APIs changed and I
didn't rebase correctly.
It's now several
Nicolas,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Dufresne
wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 mai 2015 à 21:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit
> :
>> The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
>> lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
>>
Le mercredi 20 mai 2015 à 21:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit
:
> The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
> lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
> comments back. The comments are discussed and actioned, and a new
> set of
Le mercredi 20 mai 2015 à 21:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit
:
The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
lists for review. Kernel developers review the patches and provide
comments back. The comments are discussed and actioned, and a new
set of patches
Nicolas,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Dufresne
nicolas.dufre...@collabora.com wrote:
Le mercredi 20 mai 2015 à 21:55 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit
:
The way kernel development works is that patches are sent to mailing
lists for review. Kernel developers review the
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:05:41PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
> I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
> working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
>
> https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
>
> (Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as
Hi Enrico,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
> working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
>
> https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
That's
Hi folks,
I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
(Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it broke some other things for me.)
cu
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Hi Enrico,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
weig...@melag.de wrote:
Hi folks,
I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
Hi folks,
I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
(Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it broke some other things for me.)
cu
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:05:41PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
I've rebased the IPUv3 patches from ptx folks onto 4.0.4,
working good for me. (now gst plays h264 @25fps on imx53)
https://github.com/metux/linux/commits/submit-4.0-imx53-ipuv3
(Haven't 4.1rc* yet, as it
14 matches
Mail list logo
