On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:54:57AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:30:44 -0800,
> "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
> >that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
> >I was
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:06:04PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:49:43 -0700,
> "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Microsoft drivers have an .INIT code section that is initialization
> >ccode that get's chunked after it's loaded. Their model allows
> >memory
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:49:43 -0700,
"Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Microsoft drivers have an .INIT code section that is initialization
>ccode that get's chunked after it's loaded. Their model allows
>memory segments to be defined as DISCARDABLE, which tells the loader
>to chunk
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
> >>that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
> >>I
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:45:34AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:01:35 -0700,
> "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >insmod ppp_deflate (should trigger load of all these modules). I
> >know it's works this way if there's a modules.dep file laying
> >around, but
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
>>that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
>>I was wondering if anyone is contemplating adding support for
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:01:35 -0700,
"Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>insmod ppp_deflate (should trigger load of all these modules). I
>know it's works this way if there's a modules.dep file laying
>around, but it would be nice for it to work this way without
>needing the external
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:54:57AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:30:44 -0800,
> "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
> >that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
> >I was
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:30:44 -0800,
"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
>that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
>I was wondering if anyone is contemplating adding support for
>__init{,data} in
In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
I was wondering if anyone is contemplating adding support for
__init{,data} in module loading, to reduce the memory footprints
of modules after they have been
In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
I was wondering if anyone is contemplating adding support for
__init{,data} in module loading, to reduce the memory footprints
of modules after they have been
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:30:44 -0800,
"Adam J. Richter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
I was wondering if anyone is contemplating adding support for
__init{,data} in module
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:54:57AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:30:44 -0800,
"Adam J. Richter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
I was wondering if
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:01:35 -0700,
"Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
insmod ppp_deflate (should trigger load of all these modules). I
know it's works this way if there's a modules.dep file laying
around, but it would be nice for it to work this way without
needing the external text
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Adam J. Richter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
I was wondering if anyone is contemplating adding support for
__init{,data} in module
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:45:34AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:01:35 -0700,
"Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
insmod ppp_deflate (should trigger load of all these modules). I
know it's works this way if there's a modules.dep file laying
around, but it would
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote:
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Adam J. Richter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
I was wondering if
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:49:43 -0700,
"Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft drivers have an .INIT code section that is initialization
ccode that get's chunked after it's loaded. Their model allows
memory segments to be defined as DISCARDABLE, which tells the loader
to chunk them
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:06:04PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:49:43 -0700,
"Jeff V. Merkey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft drivers have an .INIT code section that is initialization
ccode that get's chunked after it's loaded. Their model allows
memory segments to
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:54:57AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:30:44 -0800,
"Adam J. Richter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover
that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module.
I was wondering if
20 matches
Mail list logo
