> So, what do you prefer? Send it yourself,
I became concerned that “my patch” would not get picked up because of
Greg's communication settings (for my initial messages when they do not get
resent by other contributors).
> or want me to send it with your sign-off too? (since was your idea).
I
> So, what do you prefer? Send it yourself,
I became concerned that “my patch” would not get picked up because of
Greg's communication settings (for my initial messages when they do not get
resent by other contributors).
> or want me to send it with your sign-off too? (since was your idea).
I
On 12/16/2017 04:27 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Thanks for the fix.
>
> Thanks for your positive feedback.
>
>
>> I was on vacation - but now seeing all the analysis made here,
>
> I assume that special communication settings could trigger
> corresponding consequences for the discussed
On 12/16/2017 04:27 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Thanks for the fix.
>
> Thanks for your positive feedback.
>
>
>> I was on vacation - but now seeing all the analysis made here,
>
> I assume that special communication settings could trigger
> corresponding consequences for the discussed
> Thanks for the fix.
Thanks for your positive feedback.
> I was on vacation - but now seeing all the analysis made here,
I assume that special communication settings could trigger
corresponding consequences for the discussed source code adjustment.
> if "ch" can't be NULL then please go
> Thanks for the fix.
Thanks for your positive feedback.
> I was on vacation - but now seeing all the analysis made here,
I assume that special communication settings could trigger
corresponding consequences for the discussed source code adjustment.
> if "ch" can't be NULL then please go
6 matches
Mail list logo