On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 2:25 AM Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose we discuss the possibility of taking kconfig and
> making it a git subtree under the Linux kernel. This would allow
> other projects outside of the Linux kernel to be able to update their
> own copy / fork of kconfig i
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> Luis Chamberlain writes:
>
> > I'd like to propose we discuss the possibility of taking kconfig and
> > making it a git subtree under the Linux kernel. This would allow
> > other projects outside of the Linux kernel to be able to
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:13:29AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 05:25:44PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > I'd like to propose we discuss the possibility of taking kconfig and
> > making it a git subtree under the Linux kernel. This would allow
> > other projects out
Luis Chamberlain writes:
> I'd like to propose we discuss the possibility of taking kconfig and
> making it a git subtree under the Linux kernel. This would allow
> other projects outside of the Linux kernel to be able to update their
> own copy / fork of kconfig in a jiffie *very* easily.
I am
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 05:25:44PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> I'd like to propose we discuss the possibility of taking kconfig and
> making it a git subtree under the Linux kernel. This would allow
> other projects outside of the Linux kernel to be able to update their
> own copy / fork of kc
I'd like to propose we discuss the possibility of taking kconfig and
making it a git subtree under the Linux kernel. This would allow
other projects outside of the Linux kernel to be able to update their
own copy / fork of kconfig in a jiffie *very* easily.
Why? kconfig has far outlived its own pu
6 matches
Mail list logo