On Tue 17-04-18 16:15:07, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> On 17/04/2018 04:02 μμ, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> >> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
> >> noticed
> >> the following:
> >
> > OK, I was looking into this for
On Tue 17-04-18 16:15:07, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> On 17/04/2018 04:02 μμ, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> >> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
> >> noticed
> >> the following:
> >
> > OK, I was looking into this for
On 17/04/2018 04:02 μμ, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
>> noticed
>> the following:
>
> OK, I was looking into this for some time and couldn't find a problem in
> 4.14.32 code. Can you
On 17/04/2018 04:02 μμ, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
>> noticed
>> the following:
>
> OK, I was looking into this for some time and couldn't find a problem in
> 4.14.32 code. Can you
On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
> noticed
> the following:
OK, I was looking into this for some time and couldn't find a problem in
4.14.32 code. Can you try running a kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB and
On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
> noticed
> the following:
OK, I was looking into this for some time and couldn't find a problem in
4.14.32 code. Can you try running a kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB and
Hi,
On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
> noticed
> the following:
Thanks for the report! So I believe this is the same underlying problem as
for the softlockups you were observing - there I believe the
Hi,
On Tue 17-04-18 12:39:32, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I
> noticed
> the following:
Thanks for the report! So I believe this is the same underlying problem as
for the softlockups you were observing - there I believe the
Hi,
In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I noticed
the following:
[138630.417246] cache_from_obj: Wrong slab cache. fsnotify_mark_connector but
object is from kmalloc-2048(361:anycast-healthchecker.service)
[138630.477075] [ cut here
Hi,
In one of our production servers where we run kernel version 4.14.32, I noticed
the following:
[138630.417246] cache_from_obj: Wrong slab cache. fsnotify_mark_connector but
object is from kmalloc-2048(361:anycast-healthchecker.service)
[138630.477075] [ cut here
10 matches
Mail list logo