On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:44:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > > OK. Well all of your hits for 405EX, 440GRX, 440SPe, and
> > > WANT_DEVICE_TREE in arch/powerpc seem bogus. I dunno if you prune
> >
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:44:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > OK. Well all of your hits for 405EX, 440GRX, 440SPe, and
> > WANT_DEVICE_TREE in arch/powerpc seem bogus. I dunno if you prune
> > those when reported or not.
>
> not normally, but
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> OK. Well all of your hits for 405EX, 440GRX, 440SPe, and
> WANT_DEVICE_TREE in arch/powerpc seem bogus. I dunno if you prune
> those when reported or not.
not normally, but i don't know what you mean by "bogus":
$ grep -r "config 405EX" *
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:07:27 -0500 (EST)
"Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
> > "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:07:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
> > > "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:07:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
> > "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from
> > > my scanning
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from
> > my scanning scripts. the first updated output is the list of
> > currently unused Kconfig
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
"Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from my
> scanning scripts. the first updated output is the list of currently
> unused Kconfig variables -- variables that are defined in some
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:56:34AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > latest output here, sorted by architecture:
> >
> > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Unused_CONFIG_variables
> >
> > as always, there will probably be some false positives for
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:56:34AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> latest output here, sorted by architecture:
>
> http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Unused_CONFIG_variables
>
> as always, there will probably be some false positives for one reason
> or another.
>
>
now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from my
scanning scripts. the first updated output is the list of currently
unused Kconfig variables -- variables that are defined in some Kconfig
file somewhere but appear to be entirely unused throughout the source
tree.
latest
now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from my
scanning scripts. the first updated output is the list of currently
unused Kconfig variables -- variables that are defined in some Kconfig
file somewhere but appear to be entirely unused throughout the source
tree.
latest
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:56:34AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
latest output here, sorted by architecture:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Unused_CONFIG_variables
as always, there will probably be some false positives for one reason
or another.
SH_SDK7780_STANDALONE
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from my
scanning scripts. the first updated output is the list of currently
unused Kconfig variables -- variables that are defined in some Kconfig
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:07:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from
my scanning scripts. the
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from
my scanning scripts. the first updated output is the list of
currently unused Kconfig variables --
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:07:27 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating the output from
my
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
OK. Well all of your hits for 405EX, 440GRX, 440SPe, and
WANT_DEVICE_TREE in arch/powerpc seem bogus. I dunno if you prune
those when reported or not.
not normally, but i don't know what you mean by bogus:
$ grep -r config 405EX *
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:07:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that 2.6.25-rc1 is out, i can start updating
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:44:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
OK. Well all of your hits for 405EX, 440GRX, 440SPe, and
WANT_DEVICE_TREE in arch/powerpc seem bogus. I dunno if you prune
those when reported or not.
not normally, but i don't
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:44:27AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
OK. Well all of your hits for 405EX, 440GRX, 440SPe, and
WANT_DEVICE_TREE in arch/powerpc seem bogus. I dunno if you prune
those when
21 matches
Mail list logo