On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:00:15 +
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Meanwhile, to solve the problem for these people, and without introducing
> > a lot of new code at this stage in the release, perhaps you can suggest
> > a more accurate way to detect PATA vs. SATA so we can fix the bug?
> Meanwhile, to solve the problem for these people, and without introducing
> a lot of new code at this stage in the release, perhaps you can suggest
> a more accurate way to detect PATA vs. SATA so we can fix the bug?
I think the problem starts with the question. It supposes the BIOS knows
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:40:59 +
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead merge the one that fixe the non PCI
> crashes and we might get further.
In bugzilla #7907 you could post your patch and see if the reporters there
can at least confirm that it fixes their problem.
Meanwhile, to
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:40:59 +
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead merge the one that fixe the non PCI
crashes and we might get further.
In bugzilla #7907 you could post your patch and see if the reporters there
can at least confirm that it fixes their problem.
Meanwhile, to solve
Meanwhile, to solve the problem for these people, and without introducing
a lot of new code at this stage in the release, perhaps you can suggest
a more accurate way to detect PATA vs. SATA so we can fix the bug?
I think the problem starts with the question. It supposes the BIOS knows
the
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:00:15 +
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile, to solve the problem for these people, and without introducing
a lot of new code at this stage in the release, perhaps you can suggest
a more accurate way to detect PATA vs. SATA so we can fix the bug?
I
On Saturday 10 March 2007 06:30, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > Gitweb:
> > http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
> > Commit: df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
> > Parent:
> Alan has been actively working on PATA ACPI, and we have been debugging
> ACPI issues as well. PLEASE coordinate with the maintainer, when
> touching code outside of drivers/acpi!
ap->cbl is not a reliable way to tell SATA from PATA at the moment. We
need to fix the real crashes too - right
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
Commit: df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
Parent: 908e0a8a265fe8057604a9a30aec3f0be7bb5ebb
Author: Kristen
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
Commit: df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
Parent: 908e0a8a265fe8057604a9a30aec3f0be7bb5ebb
Author: Kristen
Alan has been actively working on PATA ACPI, and we have been debugging
ACPI issues as well. PLEASE coordinate with the maintainer, when
touching code outside of drivers/acpi!
ap-cbl is not a reliable way to tell SATA from PATA at the moment. We
need to fix the real crashes too - right now
On Saturday 10 March 2007 06:30, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
Commit: df33c77e3981e71afc8727ee5c432ba1a1bba68c
Parent:
12 matches
Mail list logo
