Re: linux-next: No tree for Oct 20th

2017-10-31 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:42:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:32:02 + Mark Brown wrote: > > There will be no -next tree today, there are too many non-trivial > > conflicts for things to complete in a reasonable time. > Thanks very much for

Re: linux-next: No tree for Oct 20th

2017-10-31 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:42:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:32:02 + Mark Brown wrote: > > There will be no -next tree today, there are too many non-trivial > > conflicts for things to complete in a reasonable time. > Thanks very much for you efforts while I

Re: linux-next: No tree for Oct 20th

2017-10-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mark, On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:32:02 + Mark Brown wrote: > > There will be no -next tree today, there are too many non-trivial > conflicts for things to complete in a reasonable time. Thanks very much for you efforts while I was traveling. I am back now and will restart

Re: linux-next: No tree for Oct 20th

2017-10-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mark, On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:32:02 + Mark Brown wrote: > > There will be no -next tree today, there are too many non-trivial > conflicts for things to complete in a reasonable time. Thanks very much for you efforts while I was traveling. I am back now and will restart linux-next tomorrow

linux-next: No tree for Oct 20th

2017-10-30 Thread Mark Brown
There will be no -next tree today, there are too many non-trivial conflicts for things to complete in a reasonable time. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

linux-next: No tree for Oct 20th

2017-10-30 Thread Mark Brown
There will be no -next tree today, there are too many non-trivial conflicts for things to complete in a reasonable time. signature.asc Description: PGP signature