Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 04:29:36PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:20:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Commit > > > > bfb5aa1685d5 ("net/sunrpc: fix useless comparison in proc_do_xprt()") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. >

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:20:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit > > bfb5aa1685d5 ("net/sunrpc: fix useless comparison in proc_do_xprt()") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. I split the original patch in 2 and fixed a bug in this second patch, but unless I

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi all, Commit bfb5aa1685d5 ("net/sunrpc: fix useless comparison in proc_do_xprt()") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpfb8lc5uW7z.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:41:05PM +, James Ettle wrote: > I'm OK with that. (This is the first time I've ventured into kernel space so > I thought it better to at least sketch a solution and let the experts do it > correctly ;) Glad it's passed the review!) OK, thanks!--b.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:41:05PM +, James Ettle wrote: > I'm OK with that. (This is the first time I've ventured into kernel space so > I thought it better to at least sketch a solution and let the experts do it > correctly ;) Glad it's passed the review!) OK, thanks!--b.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hello, I'm OK with that. (This is the first time I've ventured into kernel space so I thought it better to at least sketch a solution and let the experts do it correctly ;) Glad it's passed the review!) Thanks, James. On 23 February 2018 01:05:45 GMT+00:00, "J. Bruce Fields"

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hello, I'm OK with that. (This is the first time I've ventured into kernel space so I thought it better to at least sketch a solution and let the experts do it correctly ;) Glad it's passed the review!) Thanks, James. On 23 February 2018 01:05:45 GMT+00:00, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: >On Thu,

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:39:43AM +, James Ettle wrote: > I only really posted this as a demo of a fix. I was hoping someone who > actually knows what they're doing in the kernel would pick it up and make it > proper. Whoops, sorry, I didn't realize that. But I don't see a problem with

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:39:43AM +, James Ettle wrote: > I only really posted this as a demo of a fix. I was hoping someone who > actually knows what they're doing in the kernel would pick it up and make it > proper. Whoops, sorry, I didn't realize that. But I don't see a problem with

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi, Commit 35da1ba8af70 ("sunrpc: Fix unaligned access on sparc64") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgppHMLVvuZtX.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi, Commit 35da1ba8af70 ("sunrpc: Fix unaligned access on sparc64") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgppHMLVvuZtX.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi Bruce, On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:38:40 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > I rebased (probably unnecessarily, sorry), so your scripts probably > caught this as a new commit. Ah, OK, sorry for the noise. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi Bruce, On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:38:40 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > I rebased (probably unnecessarily, sorry), so your scripts probably > caught this as a new commit. Ah, OK, sorry for the noise. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:52:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Commit > > 64ebe12494fd ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from > nfs4_laundromat") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. Previously:

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:52:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Commit > > 64ebe12494fd ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from > nfs4_laundromat") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. Previously:

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi Bruce, Commit 64ebe12494fd ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from nfs4_laundromat") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi Bruce, Commit 64ebe12494fd ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from nfs4_laundromat") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 06:51:35AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > Commit > > 988e4fd55729 ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from > nfs4_laundromat") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. It fixes a typo in two lines in pretty much the only way possible, so

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 06:51:35AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > Commit > > 988e4fd55729 ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from > nfs4_laundromat") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. It fixes a typo in two lines in pretty much the only way possible, so

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi, Commit 988e4fd55729 ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from nfs4_laundromat") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi, Commit 988e4fd55729 ("nfsd: fix panic in posix_unblock_lock called from nfs4_laundromat") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:21:41PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:48:21AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > Commit > > > > 1b7f1a85c0fa ("opdesc will be useful outside nfs4proc.c") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:21:41PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:48:21AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > Commit > > > > 1b7f1a85c0fa ("opdesc will be useful outside nfs4proc.c") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:48:21AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Commit > > 1b7f1a85c0fa ("opdesc will be useful outside nfs4proc.c") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer. Fixed, thanks.--b.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:48:21AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Commit > > 1b7f1a85c0fa ("opdesc will be useful outside nfs4proc.c") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer. Fixed, thanks.--b.

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi Bruce, Commit 1b7f1a85c0fa ("opdesc will be useful outside nfs4proc.c") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree

Hi Bruce, Commit 1b7f1a85c0fa ("opdesc will be useful outside nfs4proc.c") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell