Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 (drivers/hid/hid-u2fzero.c)

2019-04-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 4/10/19 11:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190410: > on i386: ERROR: "devm_hwrng_register" [drivers/hid/hid-u2fzero.ko] undefined! Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy # # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT. # Linux/i386 5.1.0-rc4 Kernel

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2019-04-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190410: The orangefs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20190410. The drm tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a driver. The drm-misc tree still had its build failure for which I marked a driver as BROKEN. The apparmor tree

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2018-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.18 destined stuff to your linux-next included trees until after v4.17-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20180410: The parisc-hd tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1234 1303 files

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2018-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.18 destined stuff to your linux-next included trees until after v4.17-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20180410: The parisc-hd tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1234 1303 files

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2017-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170410: The crypto tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree. The drm tree gained a conflict against the v4l-dvb tree. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The kvm-ppc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted 4 commits. The staging tree gained

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2017-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170410: The crypto tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree. The drm tree gained a conflict against the v4l-dvb tree. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The kvm-ppc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted 4 commits. The staging tree gained

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2016-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160408: The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2971 2781 files changed, 115585 insertions(+), 69801 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2016-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160408: The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2971 2781 files changed, 115585 insertions(+), 69801 deletions(-)

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2014-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:03:13 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 568 > 1077 files changed, 16245 insertions(+), 11823 deletions(-) Actually ... Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 533 996 files changed, 12720 insertions(+), 12603

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2014-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add material intended for v3.16 to your linux-next included branches until after v3.15-rc1 is released. This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140410: Dropped trees: akpm-current, akpm (too complex conflicts) The arm tree

linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2014-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add material intended for v3.16 to your linux-next included branches until after v3.15-rc1 is released. This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140410: Dropped trees: akpm-current, akpm (too complex conflicts) The arm tree

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11

2014-04-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:03:13 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 568 1077 files changed, 16245 insertions(+), 11823 deletions(-) Actually ... Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 533 996 files changed, 12720

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:14:31PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Changes since 20130410: >> > >> > The tip tree gained conflicts against the net-next and pm

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:14:31PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130410: The tip tree gained conflicts

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-11 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:14:31PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130410: > > > > The tip tree gained conflicts against the net-next and pm trees. > > > > The driver-core tree gained a conflict against

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130410: >> >> The tip tree gained conflicts against the net-next and pm trees. >> >> The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the tip tree. >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130410: The tip tree gained conflicts against the net-next and pm trees. The driver-core tree gained a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 11 [ crypto: aesni-intel ]

2013-04-11 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:14:31PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20130410: The tip tree gained conflicts against the net-next and pm trees. The driver-core tree gained a conflict