On 2/15/21 1:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20210212:
>
CXL on i386 has these issue:
../drivers/cxl/mem.c:335:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘writeq’;
did you mean ‘writel’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
writeq(cmd_reg, cxlm->mbox_regs +
On 2/15/21 1:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20210212:
>
on x86_64:
ld: certs/blacklist.o: in function `is_key_on_revocation_list':
blacklist.c:(.text+0x20d): undefined reference to `pkcs7_validate_trust'
Full randconfig file is attached.
--
~Randy
Reported-by:
Hi all,
Changes since 20210212:
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree.
The mtd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20210212.
The ftrace tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10363
10514 files
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:48 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 2/14/19 10:03 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190214:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> ld: net/core/lwt_bpf.o: in function `bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute':
> lwt_bpf.c:(.text+0x11e): undefined reference to
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:48 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 2/14/19 10:03 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190214:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> ld: net/core/lwt_bpf.o: in function `bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute':
> lwt_bpf.c:(.text+0x11e): undefined reference to
On 2/14/19 10:03 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190214:
>
on x86_64:
ld: net/core/lwt_bpf.o: in function `bpf_lwt_xmit_reroute':
lwt_bpf.c:(.text+0x11e): undefined reference to `ip_route_output_flow'
ld: net/core/lwt_bpf.o: in function `bpf_input':
Hi all,
Changes since 20190214:
The tip tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree.
The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere,
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7981
8238 files changed, 332149 insertions(+), 195576 deletions(-)
Hi all,
Changes since 20180214:
The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180214.
The mmc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180214.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1794
2149 files changed, 75703 insertions(+), 44258
Hi all,
Changes since 20180214:
The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180214.
The mmc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180214.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1794
2149 files changed, 75703 insertions(+), 44258
Hi all,
Changes since 20170214:
The net tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch.
The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree.
The rdma tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the
net-next tree for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The kvm
Hi all,
Changes since 20170214:
The net tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch.
The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree.
The rdma tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the
net-next tree for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The kvm
Hi all,
Changes since 20160212:
The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160111.
The akpm-current tree gained conflict against the mips tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4580
3966 files changed, 164257 insertions(+), 72564 deletions(-)
Hi all,
Changes since 20160212:
The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160111.
The akpm-current tree gained conflict against the mips tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4580
3966 files changed, 164257 insertions(+), 72564 deletions(-)
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> News: Yesterday was the 5th anniversary of linux-next! I can't believe I
> am still doing this :-)
>
So 5-times a happy Quentin Valentino day!
> Changes since 20130214:
>
> New tree: drm-intel
>
More black roses for
On 02/15/2013 08:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> News: Yesterday was the 5th anniversary of linux-next! I can't
> believe I am still doing this :-)
Was it a big celebration? ;-) Keep up the good work.
Gr. AvS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On 02/15/2013 08:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
News: Yesterday was the 5th anniversary of linux-next! I can't
believe I am still doing this :-)
Was it a big celebration? ;-) Keep up the good work.
Gr. AvS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
News: Yesterday was the 5th anniversary of linux-next! I can't believe I
am still doing this :-)
So 5-times a happy Quentin Valentino day!
Changes since 20130214:
New tree: drm-intel
More black
Hi Andy,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:01:09 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thats cool except that the tags seem to be missing in your public tree.
> Tags do not get pushed automatically, you have to push them manually,
> perhaps they were missed?
Ooops sorry. Should be right,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:31:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> Between each merge, the tree was built with allmodconfig for both
> powerpc and x86_64.
>
> You can
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:31:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
Between each merge, the tree was built with allmodconfig for both
powerpc and x86_64.
You can see which
Hi Andy,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:01:09 + Andy Whitcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats cool except that the tags seem to be missing in your public tree.
Tags do not get pushed automatically, you have to push them manually,
perhaps they were missed?
Ooops sorry. Should be right, now.
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
Between each merge, the tree was built with allmodconfig for both
powerpc and x86_64.
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Trees file
in the source.
The
Hi all,
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
Between each merge, the tree was built with allmodconfig for both
powerpc and x86_64.
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Trees file
in the source.
The
23 matches
Mail list logo
