linux-next: Tree for Jun 11

2020-06-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: The merge window has opened, so please do *not* add v5.9 material to your linux-next included branches until after v5.8-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20200610: My fixes tree contains: 4cb4bfffe2c1 ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") The tip tree gained

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 11 (drivers/dma/dw-edma/)

2019-06-11 Thread Vinod Koul
On 11-06-19, 10:30, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 6/11/19 2:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20190607: > > > > on x86_64 or i386: > > when CONFIG_PCI is not set/enabled: > > ../drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c: In function ‘dw_edma_irq_request’: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 11 (net/dsa/tag_sja1105.c)

2019-06-11 Thread Vladimir Oltean
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 21:30, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 6/11/19 2:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20190607: > > > > on i386: > > # > # Library routines > # > # CONFIG_PACKING is not set > > ld: net/dsa/tag_sja1105.o: in function `sja1105_rcv': >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 11 (net/dsa/tag_sja1105.c)

2019-06-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 6/11/19 2:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190607: > on i386: # # Library routines # # CONFIG_PACKING is not set ld: net/dsa/tag_sja1105.o: in function `sja1105_rcv': tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x40b): undefined reference to `packing' ld: tag_sja1105.c:(.text+0x423):

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 11 (kernel/sysctl.c)

2019-06-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 6/11/19 2:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190607: > on i386: when CONFIG_SYSCTL is not set/enabled: ../kernel/sysctl.c: In function '_proc_do_string': ../kernel/sysctl.c:2003:7: error: 'sysctl_writes_strict' undeclared (first use in this function); did you

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 11 (drivers/dma/dw-edma/)

2019-06-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 6/11/19 2:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190607: > on x86_64 or i386: when CONFIG_PCI is not set/enabled: ../drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c: In function ‘dw_edma_irq_request’: ../drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c:784:3: error: implicit declaration of

linux-next: Tree for Jun 11

2019-06-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190607: The fbdev tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree. It also gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The crypto tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The drm tree gained conflicts

linux-next: Tree for Jun 11

2015-06-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150610: The drm tree still had its build failures for which I applied a supplied patch. The block tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-mpe tree. The edac-amd tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9798 8629

linux-next: Tree for Jun 11

2015-06-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150610: The drm tree still had its build failures for which I applied a supplied patch. The block tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-mpe tree. The edac-amd tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9798 8629

linux-next: Tree for Jun 11

2014-06-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. Changes since 20140610: Dropped tree: drm-intel-fixes (build problems) The drm-intel-fixes still had its build failure so I dropped it at the maintainers request. The pci tree gained a build failure so I used the version from

linux-next: Tree for Jun 11

2014-06-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. Changes since 20140610: Dropped tree: drm-intel-fixes (build problems) The drm-intel-fixes still had its build failure so I dropped it at the maintainers request. The pci tree gained a build failure so I used the version from