On 3/22/21 12:16 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 3/22/21 12:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next may still based on v5.12-rc1,
so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
On 3/22/21 12:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next may still based on v5.12-rc1,
> so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
>
> News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
> v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere
Hi all,
Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next may still based on v5.12-rc1,
so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please
consider rebasing it onto
Hi all,
Changes since 20190321:
The amdgpu tree lost its build failure.
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm-intel-fixes tree.
The scsi tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2415
2026 files changed, 68546 insertions(+), 33551 deletions(-)
Linux Kernel Mailing List ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Linux PM list <linux...@vger.kernel.org>; Zhang,
> Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 22 (thermal)
> Importance: High
>
> Rui,
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Rand
M list ; Zhang,
> Rui
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 22 (thermal)
> Importance: High
>
> Rui,
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> >
Rui,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20180321:
> >
> > The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
> >
>
> on i386:
>
> ERROR: "nsec_to_clock_t"
Rui,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20180321:
> >
> > The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
> >
>
> on i386:
>
> ERROR: "nsec_to_clock_t"
On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180321:
>
> The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
on i386:
ERROR: "nsec_to_clock_t" [drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.ko] undefined!
so in drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c, please add:
On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180321:
>
> The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
on i386:
ERROR: "nsec_to_clock_t" [drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.ko] undefined!
so in drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c, please add:
Hi all,
Changes since 20180321:
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The rdma tree gained a conflict against the rdma-fixes tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the mac80211 tree.
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20180321:
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The rdma tree gained a conflict against the rdma-fixes tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the mac80211 tree.
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20170321:
The drm tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel-fixes tree.
The char-misc tree gained a conflict against the tpmdd tree.
The char-misc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
fix patch.
The livepatching tree gained a conflict against the tip
Hi all,
Changes since 20170321:
The drm tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel-fixes tree.
The char-misc tree gained a conflict against the tpmdd tree.
The char-misc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
fix patch.
The livepatching tree gained a conflict against the tip
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included
trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20160321:
The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The rdma tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The drm tree lost its build failure.
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included
trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20160321:
The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The rdma tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The drm tree lost its build failure.
Hi all,
Changes since 20130321:
New trees: mailbox, imx-mxs
Linus' tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The sound-asoc tree lost its build failures.
The tty tree lost one of its build failures but still had the other so I
used the version from next-20130319.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20130321:
New trees: mailbox, imx-mxs
Linus' tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The sound-asoc tree lost its build failures.
The tty tree lost one of its build failures but still had the other so I
used the version from next-20130319.
The
18 matches
Mail list logo
