Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 24 (drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c)

2021-03-25 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:54:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 3/24/21 3:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20210323: > > > > > on x86_64: > # CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set > > > ../drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function ‘pch_uart_init_port’: > ../drivers/tt

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 24 (drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c)

2021-03-24 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 3/24/21 3:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20210323: > on x86_64: # CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set ../drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function ‘pch_uart_init_port’: ../drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c:1815:9: error: ‘port_regs_ops’ undeclared (first use in this functi

linux-next: Tree for Mar 24

2021-03-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210323: New tree: clk-imx The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree. The akpm-current tree still had its its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6151 6042 files changed, 383707 insertions(+), 129419 deletions(-) --

linux-next: Tree for Mar 24

2017-03-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170323: The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The leds tree gained a conflict against the drivers-x86 tree. The char-misc tree changed its conflict against the tpmdd tree. The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against the tip tree. The akpm tree gained

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 24 (events/amd/power)

2016-03-24 Thread Huang Rui
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:05:03AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 03/23/16 19:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included > > trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released. > > > > Changes since 20160323: > > > > on i386: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 24 (events/amd/power)

2016-03-24 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/23/16 19:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included > trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20160323: > on i386: when CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL is not enabled: In file included from ../include/linux/ko

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 24

2016-03-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:09:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included > trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released. I forgot to say that there will be no linux-next release tomorrow or Monday. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Tree for Mar 24

2016-03-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released. Changes since 20160323: Dropped tree: overlayfs The overlayfs gained conflicts against the ext4 tree due to an incompatible version of a patch applied to both trees. I droppe

linux-next: Tree for Mar 24

2015-03-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150323: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The thermal-soc tree gained a conflict against the thermal tree. The net-next tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the vfs tree for which I applied a merge fix patch. The sta

linux-next: Tree for Mar 24

2014-03-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140321: The samsung tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The drm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The tip tree gained a conflict