Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c)

2020-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/20 12:05 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201125: > on i386: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PCIE_DW_HOST Depends on [n]: PCI [=y] && PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN [=n] Selected by [y]: - PCI_EXYNOS [=y] && PCI [=y] && (ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2020-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20201125: The userns tree gained a conflict against the bpf-next tree. The akpm tree gained a conflict against the arm64 tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7970 7677 files changed, 623133 insertions(+), 130445 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2018-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181123: I am now building with the -Wimplicit-fallthrough gcc flag to help Kees Cook prevent new such warnings from being added. The mips-misc tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree. The drm tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc-fixes tree. The etnaviv

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2018-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181123: I am now building with the -Wimplicit-fallthrough gcc flag to help Kees Cook prevent new such warnings from being added. The mips-misc tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree. The drm tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc-fixes tree. The etnaviv

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (mm/page_owner.c)

2015-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/25/15 21:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Reminder: there will be no linux-next release next week (Nov 30 - Dec 4). > > Changes since 20151124: > on i386: mm/built-in.o: In function `read_page_owner': page_owner.c:(.text+0x25d89): undefined reference to `migrate_reason_names'

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (mm/page_owner.c)

2015-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/25/15 21:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Reminder: there will be no linux-next release next week (Nov 30 - Dec 4). > > Changes since 20151124: > on i386: mm/built-in.o: In function `read_page_owner': page_owner.c:(.text+0x25d89): undefined reference to `migrate_reason_names'

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2015-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Reminder: there will be no linux-next release next week (Nov 30 - Dec 4). Changes since 20151124: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The drm-panel tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2829 3498 files changed, 107354

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2015-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Reminder: there will be no linux-next release next week (Nov 30 - Dec 4). Changes since 20151124: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The drm-panel tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2829 3498 files changed, 107354

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2014-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:38:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20141125: > > The i2c tree lost its build failure. > > The block tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. > > The omap_dss2 tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. > > The

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2014-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20141125: The i2c tree lost its build failure. The block tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. The omap_dss2 tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The devicetree tree gained conflicts against the i2c, pm, mfd and regulator trees. The

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2014-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20141125: The i2c tree lost its build failure. The block tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. The omap_dss2 tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The devicetree tree gained conflicts against the i2c, pm, mfd and regulator trees. The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2014-11-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:38:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20141125: The i2c tree lost its build failure. The block tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. The omap_dss2 tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The devicetree

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2013-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20131125: New trees: arm-v7-cache-opt, chrome-platform My fixes tree contains: Revert "powerpc: Add CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN kernel config option." The block tree gained conflicts against the f2fs tree and a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2013-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20131125: New trees: arm-v7-cache-opt, chrome-platform My fixes tree contains: Revert powerpc: Add CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN kernel config option. The block tree gained conflicts against the f2fs tree and a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Peter Hurley
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:56:07 -0800 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20121115: > > > > > > > > > on i386: > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Peter Hurley
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:56 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20121115: > > > > > on i386: > > drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c: In function 'dma_fifo_in': > drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c:174:2: error:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:56:07 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20121115: > > > > > on i386: > > drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c: In function 'dma_fifo_in': > drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c:174:2: error:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20121115: > on i386: drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c: In function 'dma_fifo_in': drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c:174:2: error: implicit declaration of function '__WARN_printf' -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (mmc/host/tifm_sd.c)

2012-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20121115: > on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `tifm_sd_request': tifm_sd.c:(.text+0x588f95): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' somewhere inside tifm_sd_request(): I'm guessing that the call to

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2012-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20121115: The ia64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure but gained another so I used the version from next-20121026. The modules tree gained a build

linux-next: Tree for Nov 26

2012-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20121115: The ia64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure but gained another so I used the version from next-20121026. The modules tree gained a build

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (mmc/host/tifm_sd.c)

2012-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20121115: on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `tifm_sd_request': tifm_sd.c:(.text+0x588f95): undefined reference to `__udivdi3' somewhere inside tifm_sd_request(): I'm guessing that the call to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20121115: on i386: drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c: In function 'dma_fifo_in': drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c:174:2: error: implicit declaration of function '__WARN_printf' -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:56:07 -0800 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20121115: on i386: drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c: In function 'dma_fifo_in': drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c:174:2:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Peter Hurley
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 12:56 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20121115: on i386: drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c: In function 'dma_fifo_in': drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c:174:2: error: implicit

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 26 (staging/fwserial)

2012-11-26 Thread Peter Hurley
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 15:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:56:07 -0800 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 11/26/2012 06:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20121115: on i386: drivers/staging/fwserial/dma_fifo.c: In