On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/1/20 11:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20200930:
> >>>
> >>
> >> on x86_64:
> >>
> >> ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.
On 10/1/20 11:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20200930:
>>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simple_mfd_i2c_probe':
>> simple-mfd-i2c.c:(.text+
On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20200930:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simple_mfd_i2c_probe':
> simple-mfd-i2c.c:(.text+0x48): undefined reference to `__devm_regmap
On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20200930:
>
on x86_64:
ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simple_mfd_i2c_probe':
simple-mfd-i2c.c:(.text+0x48): undefined reference to `__devm_regmap_init_i2c'
ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simp
Hi all,
Changes since 20200930:
The vfs tree still had its build failure.
The hwmon-staging tree gained a build failure so I used the version
from next-20200930.
The net-next tree still had its build failure and gained conflicts
against the net tree.
The devicetree tree gained a conflict again
Hi all,
Changes since 20190930:
New trees: erofs-fixes, erofs, kunit
My fixes tree contains:
04e6dac68d9b ("powerpc/64s/radix: fix for "tidy up TLB flushing code" and
!CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU")
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 455
594 files changed, 15071 insertions(+), 4081 delet
Hi Randy,
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:26:14AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20150930:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> ../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_leave':
> ../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:584:6: err
On 10/01/15 10:49, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:39:32AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20150930:
>>>
>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c: In function 'toggle_nb_mca_mst_cpu':
>> ..
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:39:32AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20150930:
> >
>
>
> on x86_64:
>
> ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c: In function 'toggle_nb_mca_mst_cpu':
> ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c:214:42: warning: d
On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150930:
>
on x86_64:
../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c: In function 'toggle_nb_mca_mst_cpu':
../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c:214:42: warning: dereferencing 'void *' pointer
[enabled by default]
struct pci_dev *F3 = node_to_a
On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150930:
>
on x86_64:
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_leave':
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:584:6: error: implicit declaration of
function 'ip_vs_addr_is_unicast' [-Werror=implicit-function-decl
Hi all,
Changes since 20150930:
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto linux-next again :-(
The mips tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The l2-mtd tree lost its build failure.
The battery tree still had its build failure so I used the ver
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:54:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20140930:
>
> The arm-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
> 5 commits.
>
> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the berlin tree, lost
> its build failure but gained another
Hi all,
Changes since 20140930:
The arm-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
5 commits.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the berlin tree, lost
its build failure but gained another for which I applied a patch.
The vfio tree gained a conflict against the pci tree.
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131001 tag is also provided for convenience.
The situation is pretty much the same as yesterday. Some conflicts went
away, but most remai
15 matches
Mail list logo