Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o)

2020-10-01 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/1/20 11:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > >> On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20200930: > >>> > >> > >> on x86_64: > >> > >> ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o)

2020-10-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/1/20 11:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20200930: >>> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simple_mfd_i2c_probe': >> simple-mfd-i2c.c:(.text+

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o)

2020-10-01 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 01 Oct 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200930: > > > > on x86_64: > > ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simple_mfd_i2c_probe': > simple-mfd-i2c.c:(.text+0x48): undefined reference to `__devm_regmap

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o)

2020-10-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/1/20 4:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200930: > on x86_64: ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simple_mfd_i2c_probe': simple-mfd-i2c.c:(.text+0x48): undefined reference to `__devm_regmap_init_i2c' ld: drivers/mfd/simple-mfd-i2c.o: in function `simp

linux-next: Tree for Oct 1

2020-10-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200930: The vfs tree still had its build failure. The hwmon-staging tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20200930. The net-next tree still had its build failure and gained conflicts against the net tree. The devicetree tree gained a conflict again

linux-next: Tree for Oct 1

2019-09-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190930: New trees: erofs-fixes, erofs, kunit My fixes tree contains: 04e6dac68d9b ("powerpc/64s/radix: fix for "tidy up TLB flushing code" and !CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU") Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 455 594 files changed, 15071 insertions(+), 4081 delet

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (ipvs)

2015-10-01 Thread Simon Horman
Hi Randy, On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:26:14AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20150930: > > > > on x86_64: > > ../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_leave': > ../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:584:6: err

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c)

2015-10-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/01/15 10:49, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:39:32AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20150930: >>> >> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c: In function 'toggle_nb_mca_mst_cpu': >> ..

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c)

2015-10-01 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:39:32AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20150930: > > > > > on x86_64: > > ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c: In function 'toggle_nb_mca_mst_cpu': > ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c:214:42: warning: d

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c)

2015-10-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150930: > on x86_64: ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c: In function 'toggle_nb_mca_mst_cpu': ../arch/x86/ras/mce_amd_inj.c:214:42: warning: dereferencing 'void *' pointer [enabled by default] struct pci_dev *F3 = node_to_a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (ipvs)

2015-10-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150930: > on x86_64: ../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_leave': ../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:584:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_vs_addr_is_unicast' [-Werror=implicit-function-decl

linux-next: Tree for Oct 1

2015-09-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150930: I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been rebased onto linux-next again :-( The mips tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The l2-mtd tree lost its build failure. The battery tree still had its build failure so I used the ver

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1

2014-10-01 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:54:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20140930: > > The arm-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted > 5 commits. > > The net-next tree gained a conflict against the berlin tree, lost > its build failure but gained another

linux-next: Tree for Oct 1

2014-10-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140930: The arm-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted 5 commits. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the berlin tree, lost its build failure but gained another for which I applied a patch. The vfio tree gained a conflict against the pci tree.

linux-next: Tree for Oct 1

2013-10-01 Thread Thierry Reding
Hi all, I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the repository below: git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git A next-20131001 tag is also provided for convenience. The situation is pretty much the same as yesterday. Some conflicts went away, but most remai