Hi all,
Changes since 20191002:
New tree: tomoyo
My fixes tree contains:
04e6dac68d9b ("powerpc/64s/radix: fix for "tidy up TLB flushing code" and
!CONFIG_PPC_RADIX_MMU")
The amdgpu tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The keys tree with gained a conflict against mips-fixes tree.
Hi all,
Changes since 20181002:
The vfs tree gained conflicts against the f2fs tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The bpf-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20181002.
The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the c6x tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20181002:
The vfs tree gained conflicts against the f2fs tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The bpf-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20181002.
The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the c6x tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20160930:
The net-next tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The mac80211-next tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The xen-tip tree gained conflicts againt the tip tree.
The tty tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 13450
Hi all,
Changes since 20160930:
The net-next tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The mac80211-next tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The xen-tip tree gained conflicts againt the tip tree.
The tty tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 13450
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release on Monday.
Changes since 20141002:
The arm-soc tree lost its build failures.
The staging tree lost its build failure.
The target-updates gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9295
7875
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release on Monday.
Changes since 20141002:
The arm-soc tree lost its build failures.
The staging tree lost its build failure.
The target-updates gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9295
7875
On 10/04/2013 10:04 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:28:39AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:23:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > >Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped
> > >the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:00:20AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:44:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >> Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
> >> collect the results ? Either
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:44:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
>> collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ?
>
> There's a repo at:
>
>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:44:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
> collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ?
There's a repo at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/khilman/build-scripts.git
On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:23:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped
> >the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff covered in his
> >autobuilder. I'm going to use allyesconfig
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:23:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped
the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff covered in his
autobuilder. I'm going to use allyesconfig
On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:44:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ?
There's a repo at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/khilman/build-scripts.git
(Olof
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:44:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
collect the results ? Either case, any chance sharing the buildbot scripts ?
There's a
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:00:20AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:44:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Great summaries. Do you have a single builder, or several builders and
collect the results ?
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 11:28:39AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:23:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped
the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff
On 10/04/2013 10:04 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 10/03/2013 10:41 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
>> master branch of the repository below:
>>
>> git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
>>
>>
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience.
A few new conflicts
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience.
A few new conflicts today caused by the removal of the h8300
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience.
A few new conflicts today caused by the removal of the h8300
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131003 tag is also provided for convenience.
A few new conflicts
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
Hi Randy,
On 4 October 2012 07:31, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 12:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
>> until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
>>
>> Changes since 201201002:
>>
>
>
> on i386:
>
> CC
Hi Randy,
On 4 October 2012 07:31, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote:
On 10/03/2012 12:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
Changes since 201201002:
on i386:
CC
On 10/03/2012 12:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
> until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
>
> Changes since 201201002:
>
on i386:
CC drivers/mfd/syscon.o
drivers/mfd/syscon.c:94:15: error: variable
Hi all,
Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
Changes since 201201002:
Removed tree: rr
New trees: modules and virtio (replacing rr)
Conflicts are migrating as trees are merged by Linus.
The nfs tree lost its build failure.
Hi all,
Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
Changes since 201201002:
Removed tree: rr
New trees: modules and virtio (replacing rr)
Conflicts are migrating as trees are merged by Linus.
The nfs tree lost its build failure.
On 10/03/2012 12:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Do not add stuff destined for v3.8 to your linux-next included branches
until after v3.7-rc1 is released.
Changes since 201201002:
on i386:
CC drivers/mfd/syscon.o
drivers/mfd/syscon.c:94:15: error: variable
35 matches
Mail list logo
