RE: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21 (drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c)

2020-09-27 Thread Y.b. Lu
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Randy Dunlap > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 11:42 PM > To: Stephen Rothwell ; Linux Next Mailing List > > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List ; > net...@vger.kernel.org; Y.b. Lu ; Ioana Ciornei > ; Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu > >

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2020-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200918: The crypto tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The drm-msm tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree and the drm tree. The iommu tree gained a semantic conflict against the drm-msm tree. The usb tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. The

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2018-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180920: Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily) The vfs tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5045 5593 files changed, 255228 insertions(+), 112500 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2018-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180920: Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily) The vfs tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5045 5593 files changed, 255228 insertions(+), 112500 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2017-09-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170920: Linus' tree lost its build failure. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1337 1200 files changed, 49498 insertions(+), 15649 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2017-09-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170920: Linus' tree lost its build failure. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1337 1200 files changed, 49498 insertions(+), 15649 deletions(-)

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-24 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:42:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:24:04 -0700 Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > Changes since

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-24 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:42:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:24:04 -0700 Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > Changes since 20160920: > > > [...] > > > Non-merge commits (relative

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Linus, On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:24:04 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Changes since 20160920: > > [...] > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11180 > > 8424

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Linus, On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:24:04 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Changes since 20160920: > > [...] > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11180 > > 8424 files changed, 456474 insertions(+), 237951

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Changes since 20160920: > [...] > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11180 > 8424 files changed, 456474 insertions(+), 237951 deletions(-) What happened here? The previous linux-next tree was much

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Changes since 20160920: > [...] > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11180 > 8424 files changed, 456474 insertions(+), 237951 deletions(-) What happened here? The previous linux-next tree was much smaller. The "changes

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160920: The kbuild tree still had its build failure and warnings for PowerPC, for which I applied a couple of patches The powerpc tree gained conflicts against the kbuild tree. The tip tree gained a build failure (due to an interaction with the pm tree) for which I

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2016-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160920: The kbuild tree still had its build failure and warnings for PowerPC, for which I applied a couple of patches The powerpc tree gained conflicts against the kbuild tree. The tip tree gained a build failure (due to an interaction with the pm tree) for which I

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2015-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150918: I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been rebased onto something very old :-( The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150918. The bluetooth tree still had its build failure. The akpm-current

linux-next: Tree for Sep 21

2015-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150918: I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been rebased onto something very old :-( The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150918. The bluetooth tree still had its build failure. The akpm-current