On 9/23/20 4:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20200922:
>
on x86_64:
CC drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css.o
../drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css.c: In function ‘start_binary’:
../drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css.c:1384:6: error: ‘stream’
Hi all,
Changes since 20200922:
The block tree gained a conflict and a semantic conflict against Linus'
tree.
The tip tree gained a conflict against the amdgpu tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9036
9654 files changed, 330232 insertions(+), 169511 deletions(-)
Hi all,
Changes since 20160922:
The kbuild tree lost its build failure and warnings for PowerPC.
The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The kvm-arm tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160922.
The userns tree gained a conflict against the net-next
Hi all,
Changes since 20160922:
The kbuild tree lost its build failure and warnings for PowerPC.
The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The kvm-arm tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160922.
The userns tree gained a conflict against the net-next
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:07:44AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:42:36PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
>
> > Hi Ralf,
> >
> > That patch as I submitted it definitely adds arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.c
> > but somehow that file has been lost from the commit in your
> >
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:42:36PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> That patch as I submitted it definitely adds arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.c
> but somehow that file has been lost from the commit in your
> mips-for-linux-next tree. Could you re-apply it?
Thanks for reporting. The patch
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:07:44AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:42:36PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
>
> > Hi Ralf,
> >
> > That patch as I submitted it definitely adds arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.c
> > but somehow that file has been lost from the commit in your
> >
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:42:36PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> That patch as I submitted it definitely adds arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.c
> but somehow that file has been lost from the commit in your
> mips-for-linux-next tree. Could you re-apply it?
Thanks for reporting. The patch
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:23:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20150922:
> mips allmodconfig failed with the error:
> No rule to make target 'arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.o', needed by
>
On 09/22/15 21:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150922:
>
on x86_64:
net/built-in.o: In function `nf_dup_ipv4':
(.text+0xed24d): undefined reference to `nf_conntrack_untracked'
net/built-in.o: In function `nf_dup_ipv4':
(.text+0xed267): undefined reference to
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:23:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150922:
mips allmodconfig failed with the error:
No rule to make target 'arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.o', needed by
'arch/mips/mm/built-in.o'
caused by:
13ea0032658d ("MIPS: Allow L2 prefetch to be
On 09/22/15 21:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150922:
>
on x86_64:
net/built-in.o: In function `nf_dup_ipv4':
(.text+0xed24d): undefined reference to `nf_conntrack_untracked'
net/built-in.o: In function `nf_dup_ipv4':
(.text+0xed267): undefined reference to
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:23:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150922:
mips allmodconfig failed with the error:
No rule to make target 'arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.o', needed by
'arch/mips/mm/built-in.o'
caused by:
13ea0032658d ("MIPS: Allow L2 prefetch to be
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:23:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20150922:
> mips allmodconfig failed with the error:
> No rule to make target 'arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.o', needed by
>
Hi all,
Changes since 20150922:
The berlin tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20150922.
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto something very old :-(
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
The akpm tree gained a
Hi all,
Changes since 20150922:
The berlin tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20150922.
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto something very old :-(
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
The akpm tree gained a
Hi all,
Changes since 20140922:
New trees: tiny, powerpc-mpe
The tiny tree gained conflicts against the tip tree and a build failure
for which I reverted a commit.
The kvm-arm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140919.
The akpm-current tree gained a conflict
Hi all,
Changes since 20140922:
New trees: tiny, powerpc-mpe
The tiny tree gained conflicts against the tip tree and a build failure
for which I reverted a commit.
The kvm-arm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140919.
The akpm-current tree gained a conflict
Hi all,
Heads up: I will be having a 3 week break leading up to the kernel
summit. This means that next-20130927 (next Friday) will be the last
linux-next release until next-20131028 (or maybe 29). I presume that
Linus will be up to v3.12-rc7 by then and -rc7 is often the last before
a release
Hi all,
Heads up: I will be having a 3 week break leading up to the kernel
summit. This means that next-20130927 (next Friday) will be the last
linux-next release until next-20131028 (or maybe 29). I presume that
Linus will be up to v3.12-rc7 by then and -rc7 is often the last before
a release
20 matches
Mail list logo
