Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 14 (sata_highhbank)

2012-09-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > Fix patch follows. Do I need to submit it as a separate patch or is this > sufficient? You appear to have submitted it as a separate patch just now ;p Will queue and push to libata-dev.git#upstream (and thus linux-next) Jeff -- To

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 14 (sata_highhbank)

2012-09-14 Thread Mark Langsdorf
On 09/14/2012 12:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 09/14/2012 12:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 201209013: >> > > > > on i386: > > CONFIG_SATA_HIGHBANK=m > # CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM is not set > > ERROR: "ahci_sdev_attrs" [drivers/ata/sata_highbank.ko]

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 14 (sata_highhbank)

2012-09-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/14/2012 12:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 201209013: > on i386: CONFIG_SATA_HIGHBANK=m # CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM is not set ERROR: "ahci_sdev_attrs" [drivers/ata/sata_highbank.ko] undefined! ERROR: "ahci_shost_attrs" [drivers/ata/sata_highbank.ko]

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 14 (sata_highhbank)

2012-09-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/14/2012 12:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 201209013: on i386: CONFIG_SATA_HIGHBANK=m # CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM is not set ERROR: ahci_sdev_attrs [drivers/ata/sata_highbank.ko] undefined! ERROR: ahci_shost_attrs [drivers/ata/sata_highbank.ko] undefined!

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 14 (sata_highhbank)

2012-09-14 Thread Mark Langsdorf
On 09/14/2012 12:04 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 09/14/2012 12:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 201209013: on i386: CONFIG_SATA_HIGHBANK=m # CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM is not set ERROR: ahci_sdev_attrs [drivers/ata/sata_highbank.ko] undefined! ERROR:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 14 (sata_highhbank)

2012-09-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Mark Langsdorf mark.langsd...@calxeda.com wrote: Fix patch follows. Do I need to submit it as a separate patch or is this sufficient? You appear to have submitted it as a separate patch just now ;p Will queue and push to libata-dev.git#upstream (and thus