Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'free_area_init_node':
mm/page_alloc.c:4801:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'get_pfn_range_for_nid' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused by
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable.h:6:0,
from include/linux/mm.h:50,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:27,
from
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/rtc/class.c: In function 'rtc_init':
drivers/rtc/class.c:339:18: error: lvalue required as unary '&' operand
Caused by commit c5a32d622261 ("drivers/rtc/class: convert from Legacy pm
ops
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/rtc/class.c: In function 'rtc_init':
drivers/rtc/class.c:339:18: error: lvalue required as unary '' operand
Caused by commit c5a32d622261 (drivers/rtc/class: convert from Legacy pm
ops
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable.h:6:0,
from include/linux/mm.h:50,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:27,
from
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'free_area_init_node':
mm/page_alloc.c:4801:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'get_pfn_range_for_nid' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused by
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:10:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
> (.init.text+0xc38): undefined reference to `early_console'
>
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:10:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
(.init.text+0xc38): undefined reference to
On Mon 04-03-13 14:28:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `console_unlock':
> cpu_pm.c:(.text+0x4418): undefined reference to `__bad_udelay'
>
> Caused by commit
On Mon 04-03-13 14:28:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `console_unlock':
cpu_pm.c:(.text+0x4418): undefined reference to `__bad_udelay'
Caused by commit
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `console_unlock':
cpu_pm.c:(.text+0x4418): undefined reference to `__bad_udelay'
Caused by commit 4df7323a125f ("printk: avoid softlockups in
console_unlock()") which
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
(.init.text+0xc38): undefined reference to `early_console'
arch/sparc/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
(.init.text+0xc44): undefined
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
(.init.text+0xc38): undefined reference to `early_console'
arch/sparc/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
(.init.text+0xc44): undefined
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `console_unlock':
cpu_pm.c:(.text+0x4418): undefined reference to `__bad_udelay'
Caused by commit 4df7323a125f (printk: avoid softlockups in
console_unlock()) which
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:30:40 +0800 Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:54:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
> >
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:54:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
> arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c:60:23: error: invalid operands to binary
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:30:40 +0800 Shaohua Li s...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:54:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:54:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c:60:23: error: invalid operands to binary (have
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c:60:23: error: invalid operands to binary << (have
'atomic_long_t' and 'int')
Caused by commit "swap: add per-partition
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c:60:23: error: invalid operands to binary (have
'atomic_long_t' and 'int')
Caused by commit swap: add per-partition lock
Hi Stephen,
On 01/21/2013 02:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_find_in_range_node':
mm/memblock.c:104:2: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_find_in_range_node':
mm/memblock.c:104:2: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct
movablecore_map'
mm/memblock.c:123:4: error: invalid use of undefined type
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_find_in_range_node':
mm/memblock.c:104:2: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct
movablecore_map'
mm/memblock.c:123:4: error: invalid use of undefined type
Hi Stephen,
On 01/21/2013 02:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_find_in_range_node':
mm/memblock.c:104:2: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:09:19 -0800
> I suspect that most people expect "color". And given that this
> patchset removes COLOUR_ALIGN_DOWN (and should have removed
> arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c:COLOR_ALIGN), we end up with
That's fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:30:59 -0500 (EST)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:18:47 -0800
>
> > s/colour/color/
>
> The whole file uses the COLOUR spelling in it's macros, for
> consistency I see no reason not to use the same spelling
> for local variables.
>
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:18:47 -0800
> s/colour/color/
The whole file uses the COLOUR spelling in it's macros, for
consistency I see no reason not to use the same spelling
for local variables.
Else, fix the whole file instead of leaving an inconsistent
mess around.
--
To
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:09:57 +1100
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c: In function 'arch_get_unmapped_area':
> arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:92:16: error:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:09:57 +1100
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c: In function 'arch_get_unmapped_area':
From: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:18:47 -0800
s/colour/color/
The whole file uses the COLOUR spelling in it's macros, for
consistency I see no reason not to use the same spelling
for local variables.
Else, fix the whole file instead of leaving an
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:30:59 -0500 (EST)
David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:18:47 -0800
s/colour/color/
The whole file uses the COLOUR spelling in it's macros, for
consistency I see no reason not to use the
From: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:09:19 -0800
I suspect that most people expect color. And given that this
patchset removes COLOUR_ALIGN_DOWN (and should have removed
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c:COLOR_ALIGN), we end up with
That's fine.
--
To
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:01:54 -0800 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> oop, I fixed that but forgot to commit the changes, sorry.
>
> s/mm/current->mm/
I have applied this to the akpm tree today:
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:51:18 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix for
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:01:54 -0800 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
oop, I fixed that but forgot to commit the changes, sorry.
s/mm/current-mm/
I have applied this to the akpm tree today:
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c: In function 'arch_get_unmapped_area':
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c:41:26: error: unused variable 'vmm'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
Caused by commit "mm: use
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c: In function 'arch_get_unmapped_area':
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:92:16: error: unused variable 'start_addr'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:58:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_topdown':
> arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:299:20: error: 'mm'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_topdown':
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:299:20: error: 'mm' undeclared (first use in this
function)
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:299:20:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_topdown':
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:299:20: error: 'mm' undeclared (first use in this
function)
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:299:20:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:58:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_topdown':
arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:299:20:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c: In function 'arch_get_unmapped_area':
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:92:16: error: unused variable 'start_addr'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c: In function 'arch_get_unmapped_area':
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c:41:26: error: unused variable 'vmm'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
Caused by commit mm: use
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/rtc/class.c: In function 'rtc_init':
drivers/rtc/class.c:261:23: error: 'rtc_suspend' undeclared (first use in this
function)
drivers/rtc/class.c:261:23: note: each undeclared identifier is
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/rtc/class.c: In function 'rtc_init':
drivers/rtc/class.c:261:23: error: 'rtc_suspend' undeclared (first use in this
function)
drivers/rtc/class.c:261:23: note: each undeclared identifier is
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:34:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:24:08 -0500 David Fries wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
Hi David,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:24:08 -0500 David Fries wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `rtc_hctosys':
> hctosys.c:(.init.text+0x4a98): undefined reference to
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:01:36 +0800 Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> Index: linux/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h
> ===
> --- linux.orig/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h 2012-09-13
> 17:56:54.206807900 +0800
> +++
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:01:21PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> mm/internal.h: In function 'swap_cache_hit':
> mm/internal.h:377:3: error: implicit declaration of function
>
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `rtc_hctosys':
hctosys.c:(.init.text+0x4a98): undefined reference to `rtc_hctosys_ret'
hctosys.c:(.init.text+0x4b54): undefined reference to `rtc_hctosys_ret'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/internal.h: In function 'swap_cache_hit':
mm/internal.h:377:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'atomic_dec_if_positive' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused by commit
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/internal.h: In function 'swap_cache_hit':
mm/internal.h:377:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'atomic_dec_if_positive' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused by commit swap:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `rtc_hctosys':
hctosys.c:(.init.text+0x4a98): undefined reference to `rtc_hctosys_ret'
hctosys.c:(.init.text+0x4b54): undefined reference to `rtc_hctosys_ret'
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:01:21PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/internal.h: In function 'swap_cache_hit':
mm/internal.h:377:3: error: implicit declaration of function
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:01:36 +0800 Shaohua Li s...@kernel.org wrote:
Index: linux/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h
===
--- linux.orig/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h 2012-09-13
17:56:54.206807900 +0800
+++
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `rtc_hctosys':
hctosys.c:(.init.text+0x4a98): undefined reference to `rtc_hctosys_ret'
Hi David,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:24:08 -0500 David Fries da...@fries.net wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:34:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:24:08 -0500 David Fries da...@fries.net wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
58 matches
Mail list logo