On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:04:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:20,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:93,
>
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:1248:33: error: 'struct netns_xt' has no
> member named 'tables'
> 1248 | list_for_each_entry(t, >xt.tables[NFPROTO_BRIDGE], list) {
> | ^
> include/linux/list.h:619:20: note: in definition of macro
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:20,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:93,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from
Hi all, I've just sent the patch series:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=428099.
Thanks,
Brian
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 7:36 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 07:52:08PM -0800, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> > Hi Stephen, thanks for the
Hi Brian,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 07:52:08PM -0800, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> Hi Stephen, thanks for the report. I'm having trouble trying to
> compile for ppc, but I believe this should fix the problem, could you
> test this patch, please? Thanks!
Could you please submit the patch formally to
Hi everyone,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 20:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:52:08 -0800 Brian Vazquez wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, thanks for the report. I'm having trouble trying to
>> compile for ppc, but I believe this should fix the problem, could you
>> test this patch, please?
Hi Brian,
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:52:08 -0800 Brian Vazquez wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen, thanks for the report. I'm having trouble trying to
> compile for ppc, but I believe this should fix the problem, could you
> test this patch, please? Thanks!
That fixed it, thanks (though the patch was badly
Hi Stephen, thanks for the report. I'm having trouble trying to
compile for ppc, but I believe this should fix the problem, could you
test this patch, please? Thanks!
diff --git a/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
b/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
index 54c02c84906a..077f96be65c6 100644
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: "ip6_dst_check" [vmlinux] is a static EXPORT_SYMBOL
ERROR: modpost: "ipv4_dst_check" [vmlinux] is a static EXPORT_SYMBOL
ERROR: modpost: "ipv4_mtu" [vmlinux] is a static
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 4:08 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 02:21:26 + Steven French
> wrote:
> >
> > I applied your patch to the tip of my tree (cifs-2.6.git for-next) -
> > hopefully that makes it easier when I sent the PR in a day or two for
> >
Hi Steven,
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 02:21:26 + Steven French
wrote:
>
> I applied your patch to the tip of my tree (cifs-2.6.git for-next) -
> hopefully that makes it easier when I sent the PR in a day or two for
> cifs/smb3 changes.
I think you have just made your tree fail to build as
Hi all,
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:14:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/cifs/cifs_swn.c: In function 'cifs_swn_notify':
> fs/cifs/cifs_swn.c:450:4: error: implicit declaration of function
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
fs/cifs/cifs_swn.c: In function 'cifs_swn_notify':
fs/cifs/cifs_swn.c:450:4: error: implicit declaration of function
'nla_strlcpy'; did you mean 'nla_strscpy'?
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
net/core/xdp.c: In function 'xdp_return_frame_bulk':
net/core/xdp.c:417:3: error: too few arguments to function '__xdp_return'
417 | __xdp_return(xdpf->data, >mem, false);
|
On 10/6/20 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 07:13:01 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:58:47PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
It actually
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 07:13:01 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:58:47PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> It actually doesn't
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:58:47PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
It actually doesn't need that or the two other internal headers.
Bjoern has a fixed, and it was supposed to be
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c:7:10: fatal error: linux/dma-noncoherent.h: No such
file or directory
7 | #include
| ^
Caused by commit
1c1efc2af158
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:40:13 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:04:46 +1000
>
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > eff7423365a6 ("net: core: introduce struct netdev_nested_priv for nested
> > interface infrastructure")
> >
> >
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:04:46 +1000
> Caused by commit
>
> eff7423365a6 ("net: core: introduce struct netdev_nested_priv for nested
> interface infrastructure")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> e1189d9a5fbe ("net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver
Hi Vadym,
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 02:06:05 +0300 Vadym Kochan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 08:09:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> [CUT]
> >
> > I am still getting this build failure ...
> >
> > --
>
> I just 've checked linux-next/master and it builds fine at least
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 08:09:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
[CUT]
>
> I am still getting this build failure ...
>
> --
I just 've checked linux-next/master and it builds fine at least with my custom
config, do/how I need to handle this case ?
I see the changes
Hi all,
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:04:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c: In function
> 'prestera_port_dev_lower_find':
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c: In function
'prestera_port_dev_lower_find':
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c:504:33: error: passing
argument 2
On 2020-08-28 16:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/28/20 4:16 PM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 8:12 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/28/20 8:09 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2020-08-27 11:12 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> I've been trying to reproduce it with
On 8/28/20 4:16 PM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 8:12 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> On 8/28/20 8:09 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> On 2020-08-27 11:12 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
>>>
I've been trying to reproduce it with your config but I didn't
succeed. I also looked at
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 8:12 AM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 8/28/20 8:09 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2020-08-27 11:12 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> >
> >> I've been trying to reproduce it with your config but I didn't
> >> succeed. I also looked at the file after the preprocessor and it
> >>
On 8/28/20 8:09 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2020-08-27 11:12 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to reproduce it with your config but I didn't
>> succeed. I also looked at the file after the preprocessor and it
>> looked good:
>>
>> ret = ({ __builtin_expect(!!(ops->match ==
On 2020-08-27 11:12 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> I've been trying to reproduce it with your config but I didn't
> succeed. I also looked at the file after the preprocessor and it
> looked good:
>
> ret = ({ __builtin_expect(!!(ops->match == fib6_rule_match), 1) ?
> fib6_rule_match(rule, fl,
Hi Sven,
I've been trying to reproduce it with your config but I didn't
succeed. I also looked at the file after the preprocessor and it
looked good:
ret = ({ __builtin_expect(!!(ops->match == fib6_rule_match), 1) ?
fib6_rule_match(rule, fl, flags) : ops->match(rule, fl, flags); })
Note that
On 2020-08-22 08:16 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2020-08-21 09:23 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
>
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply, did you still see this after:
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200803131948.41736-1-yuehaib...@huawei.com/
>> ??
>
> That patch is
On 2020-08-21 09:23 -0700, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, did you still see this after:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200803131948.41736-1-yuehaib...@huawei.com/
> ??
That patch is apparently already in 5.9-rc1 as commit 80fbbb1672e7, so
yes
On 2020-07-29 21:27 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: net/core/fib_rules.o: in function `fib_rules_lookup':
> fib_rules.c:(.text+0x5c6): undefined reference to
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:31:21 +1000
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (s390 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c:335:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'csum_ipv6_magic'
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:06:27PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:31:21 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (s390 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c:335:2: error:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:21:44 +0200
Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:06:27PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:31:21 +1000
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (s390
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (s390 defconfig)
failed like this:
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c:335:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'csum_ipv6_magic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused by commit
4cb47a8644cc ("tunnels: PMTU discovery
Hi Stephen, thanks for reaching out and reporting the issue. I have
just sent the fix for review in net-next:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200729181018.3221288-1-bria...@google.com/
cheers,
Brian
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:27 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: net/core/fib_rules.o: in function `fib_rules_lookup':
fib_rules.c:(.text+0x5c6): undefined reference to `fib6_rule_match'
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: fib_rules.c:(.text+0x5d8):
On 13/07/2020 04:54, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c: In function '__vlan_tunnel_handle_range':
> net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c:271:26: error:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c: In function '__vlan_tunnel_handle_range':
net/bridge/br_netlink_tunnel.c:271:26: error: implicit declaration of function
'br_vlan_can_enter_range'; did
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 7:53 PM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 4:26 AM Andrii Nakryiko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:20 PM Masahiro Yamada
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:00 PM Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 4:26 AM Andrii Nakryiko
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:20 PM Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:00 PM Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > >
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:20 PM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:00 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: 74: Bad substitution
On 9/3/19 11:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: 74: Bad substitution
>
> Caused by commit
>
>341dfcf8d78e ("btf: expose BTF info through sysfs")
>
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:00 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: 74: Bad substitution
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 341dfcf8d78e ("btf: expose BTF info through
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: 74: Bad substitution
Caused by commit
341dfcf8d78e ("btf: expose BTF info through sysfs")
interacting with commit
1267f9d3047d ("kbuild: add $(BASH) to
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 20:05:46 +1000
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:49:27 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] net: stmmac: depend on COMMON_CLK
>
> Fixes: 190f73ab4c43 ("net: stmmac: setup higher frequency clk support for EHL
> & TGL")
> Signed-off-by:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powepc
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ld: drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_pci.o: in function
`.stmmac_pci_remove':
stmmac_pci.c:(.text.stmmac_pci_remove+0x68): undefined reference to
`.clk_unregister_fixed_rate'
ld:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (mips
cavium_octeon_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c:287:23: error: implicit declaration of
function 'skb_drag_size'; did you mean 'skb_frag_size'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Caused
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:45:57AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:33:07 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > I've added this patch to the rdma tree to fix the missing locking.
> >
> > The merge resolution will be simply swapping
> > for_ifa to
Hi Jason,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:33:07 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> I've added this patch to the rdma tree to fix the missing locking.
>
> The merge resolution will be simply swapping
> for_ifa to in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl.
OK, I added the below merge resolution patch to the merge of the
; , "David
> >Miller" , "Networking" ,
> >"Linux Next Mailing List" , "Linux Kernel
> >Mailing List"
> >Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of
> >the net-next tree
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 11, 2
ing" ,
>"Linux Next Mailing List" , "Linux Kernel
>Mailing List"
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of
>the net-next tree
>
>On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 08:00:49AM +, Bernard Metzler wrote:
>
>> That listen wil
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 08:00:49AM +, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> That listen will not sleep. The socket is just marked
> listening.
Eh? siw_listen_address() calls siw_cep_alloc() which does:
struct siw_cep *cep = kzalloc(sizeof(*cep), GFP_KERNEL);
Which is sleeping. Many other cases
Networking" , "Linux Next Mailing List"
>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the
>net-next tree
>
>On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:43:46AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Tue, J
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:16:03PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 + Jason Gunthorpe
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
Hi all,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:16:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 + Jason Gunthorpe
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
Hi all,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously
> > >
Hi Jason,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously
> > it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a
> >
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously
> it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a
> dependency changed). It failed because in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu (and
>
Hi all,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:52:17 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:43:46AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:56:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:43:46AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:56:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 02:31:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:43:46 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > From 56c9e15ec670af580daa8c3ffde9503af3042d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 10:43:42 +0300
> > Subject:
Hi Leon,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:43:46 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> From 56c9e15ec670af580daa8c3ffde9503af3042d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leon Romanovsky
> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 10:43:42 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Fixup to build SIW issue
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky
I applied
t Mailing List"
>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
>, "Bernard Metzler"
>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the
>net-next tree
>
>On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:56:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>&g
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:56:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c: In function 'siw_create_listen':
> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c:1978:3:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c: In function 'siw_create_listen':
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c:1978:3: error: implicit declaration of
function 'for_ifa'; did you mean 'fork_idle'?
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:12:45 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:13:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:48:16: error:
Hi all,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:13:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:48:16: error: field 'hw' has
> incomplete type
> struct clk_hw hw;
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:48:16: error: field 'hw' has
incomplete type
struct clk_hw hw;
^~
drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c:4003:21: error:
> On 19 Jun 2019, at 16:09, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 19 Jun 2019, at 15:13, David Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>> I've fixed this as follows, thanks:
>>
>>
>> From 23cdf8752b26d4edbd60a6293bca492d83192d4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "David S.
> On 19 Jun 2019, at 15:13, David Miller wrote:
>
>
> I've fixed this as follows, thanks:
>
>
> From 23cdf8752b26d4edbd60a6293bca492d83192d4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "David S. Miller"
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:12:58 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] act_ctinfo: Don't
I've fixed this as follows, thanks:
>From 23cdf8752b26d4edbd60a6293bca492d83192d4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David S. Miller"
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:12:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] act_ctinfo: Don't use BIT() in UAPI headers.
Use _BITUL() instead.
Reported-by:
From: Masahiro Yamada
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:14:06 +0900
> What a hell.
I know, some serious bush league coding going on in the networking
right?
Greetings!
As the guilty party in authoring this, and also pretty new around here
I’m wondering what I need to do to help clean it up?
> On 19 Jun 2019, at 05:14, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:02 PM Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:02 PM Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from
Hi.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:23 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from usr/include/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.hdrtest.c:1:
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from usr/include/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.hdrtest.c:1:
./usr/include/linux/tc_act/tc_ctinfo.h:30:21: error: implicit declaration of
function 'BIT'
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c: In function 'cpts_of_mux_clk_setup':
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c:567:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'of_clk_parent_fill'; did you mean
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from net/netfilter/utils.c:5:
include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h: In function 'nf_ipv6_br_defrag':
include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h:110:9: error: implicit declaration of
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:34:46 +1100
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:24:11 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] socket: fix for Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]_NEW
>
> Fixes: 887feae36aee ("socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]_NEW")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
Thanks for
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
defconfig) failed like this:
/home/sfr/next/next/net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_setsockopt':
/home/sfr/next/next/net/core/sock.c:1146:2: error: duplicate case value
case SO_BINDTOIFINDEX:
^~~~
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:17:42 +1100
> I have added the following fix patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:13:08 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] enetc: include linux/vmalloc.h for vzalloc etc
>
> Fixes: d4fd0404c1c9 ("enetc: Introduce basic
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c: In function 'enetc_alloc_txbdr':
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c:685:17: error: implicit
declaration of function 'vzalloc'; did
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/vxlan.c: In function 'vxlan_changelink':
drivers/net/vxlan.c:3763:10: error: too few arguments to function
'vxlan_fdb_update'
err = vxlan_fdb_update(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 12:36 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from net/core/dev.c:148:
> net/core/dev.c: In function 'napi_gro_complete':
> net/core/dev.c:5364:26:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from net/core/dev.c:148:
net/core/dev.c: In function 'napi_gro_complete':
net/core/dev.c:5364:26: error: 'inet_gro_complete' undeclared (first use in
this function); did
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/flow.c: In function
'mlx5_ib_handler_MLX5_IB_METHOD_CREATE_FLOW':
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/flow.c:163:12: error: 'struct mlx5_flow_act' has no
member named
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/flow.c: In function
'mlx5_ib_handler_MLX5_IB_METHOD_CREATE_FLOW':
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/flow.c:163:12: error: 'struct mlx5_flow_act' has no
member named
ey T
> ;
> Bowers, AndrewX
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
>
> From: "Keller, Jacob E"
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:30:42 +
>
> > There's some discussion about this going on in the intel-wired-lan
> > mailing list
ey T
> ;
> Bowers, AndrewX
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
>
> From: "Keller, Jacob E"
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:30:42 +
>
> > There's some discussion about this going on in the intel-wired-lan
> > mailing list
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/ptp/ptp_qoriq.o: In function `qoriq_ptp_probe':
ptp_qoriq.c:(.text+0xd0c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
Caused by commit
91305f281262 ("ptp_qoriq: support
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/ptp/ptp_qoriq.o: In function `qoriq_ptp_probe':
ptp_qoriq.c:(.text+0xd0c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
Caused by commit
91305f281262 ("ptp_qoriq: support
> [Christoph, I noticed that the comment above datagram_poll in
> net/core/datagram.c needs the function name updated]
I'll send a fix for that.
>
> I have added the following merge fix patch for today:
This looks correct, thanks!
> [Christoph, I noticed that the comment above datagram_poll in
> net/core/datagram.c needs the function name updated]
I'll send a fix for that.
>
> I have added the following merge fix patch for today:
This looks correct, thanks!
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
net/xdp/xsk.c: In function 'xsk_poll':
net/xdp/xsk.c:207:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'datagram_poll';
did you mean 'datagram_poll_mask'?
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
net/xdp/xsk.c: In function 'xsk_poll':
net/xdp/xsk.c:207:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'datagram_poll';
did you mean 'datagram_poll_mask'?
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
x86_64-linux-ld: unknown architecture of input file
`net/bpfilter/bpfilter_umh.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output
Caused by commit
d2ba09c17a06 ("net: add skeleton of bpfilter
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
x86_64-linux-ld: unknown architecture of input file
`net/bpfilter/bpfilter_umh.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output
Caused by commit
d2ba09c17a06 ("net: add skeleton of bpfilter
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
