Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeff Garzik wrote: Please add the 'NEXT' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often. Additional FYI: Don't be worried if git diff master..NEXT is empty from time to time. This condition

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:20:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: So, comments, please. Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number will be

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 16:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Stephen Rothwell wrote: Also, more trees please ... :-) Please add the 'NEXT' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often.

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:49:28 +0900 Paul Mundt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For SH: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgpsZoqKbvwi6.pgp

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:54:02 -0600 Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please add: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shaggy/jfs-2.6.git next Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
James Bottomley wrote: So does this indicate the meaning of upstream and upstream-fixes is still the same? I always took upstream-fixes to be bug fixes for this -rc and upstream as queued for the next merge window, in which case NEXT would be the union of those two sets? In practice,

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Martin, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:25:09 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the s390 architecture please use the features branch of git390: git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git features Added thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mauro, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:38:50 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please add v4l-dvb tree, at: ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-next.git The above tree has two branches: 'master' and 'stable' Both branches will have V4L/DVB next

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 00:35 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Also, more trees please ... :-) Please add the 'linux-next' branch of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git Cheers Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:20:32 -0800 Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number will be different, but that might not be very obvious to people reading bug

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sam, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:23:23 +0100 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild.git master Added, thanks. It is rebased from time to time and is what gets into -mm That's fine. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread David Chinner
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Also, more trees please ... :-) The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is: git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group -- To unsubscribe from

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sam, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:50:31 +0100 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A non-intrusive way to do so would be to add a file in the top-level directory and name it localversion*. For example: echo '-next' localversion-next Excellent, I will do this for the next release. --

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jeff, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:03:19 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please add the 'NEXT' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often. Added, thanks. I will continue to

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Trond, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:27:57 -0500 Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please add the 'linux-next' branch of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi David, On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:17:02 +1100 David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is: git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master Added, thanks. I have put you as the contact point - is this correct? I notice that the MAINTAINERS file has a

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread David Chinner
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi David, On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:17:02 +1100 David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is: git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master Added, thanks. I have put you as the

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Len Brown
On Thursday 14 February 2008 10:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Rafael, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps you can add: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test I would prefer that the trees be added

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Len, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:58:38 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rafael has it right, please add the branch above. It will include both the upcoming ACPI and suspend patches. Added, thanks, with you as contact. Note that I reserve the right to re-base it from time to time - so

<    1   2