Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the drm-intel tree

2014-05-20 Thread Sumit Semwal
On 20 May 2014 12:25, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > Today's linux-next merge of the dma-buf tree got a conflict in > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c between commit 5cc9ed4b9a7a > ("drm/i915: Introduce mapping of user pages into video memory (userptr) > ioctl") from the drm-intel t

linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the drm-intel tree

2014-05-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sumit, Today's linux-next merge of the dma-buf tree got a conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c between commit 5cc9ed4b9a7a ("drm/i915: Introduce mapping of user pages into video memory (userptr) ioctl") from the drm-intel tree and commit 8dfb1f0f8103 ("dma-buf: use reservation obj