Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/hfi.h
between commit:
5de61a47eb90 ("IB/hfi1: Fix probe time panic when AIP is enabled with a buggy
BIOS")
from Linus' tree and commit:
780278c2c8bb ("IB/hfi1: Rework AIP and VNIC dummy
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 22:08 +, Pearson, Robert B wrote:
> Looks perfect. Thanks.
+1
Thanks everyone.
merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 06:57:24PM +, Pearson, Robert B wrote:
> It looks like f1b0a8ea9f12 ("Revert "RDMA/rxe: Remove VLAN code
> leftovers from RXE"") has not been applied to rdma for-next which is
> where I do my work.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 06:57:24PM +, Pearson, Robert B wrote:
> It looks like f1b0a8ea9f12 ("Revert "RDMA/rxe: Remove VLAN code
> leftovers from RXE"") has not been applied to rdma for-next which is
> where I do my work. Not sure how it got upstream.
It was sent to the rc tree, don't worry
021 8:16 PM
To: Doug Ledford ; Jason Gunthorpe
Cc: Pearson, Robert B ; Bob Pearson
; Jason Gunthorpe ; Jason Gunthorpe
; Linux Kernel Mailing List ;
Linux Next Mailing List ; Martin Wilck
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
between commit:
f1b0a8ea9f12 ("Revert "RDMA/rxe: Remove VLAN code leftovers from RXE"")
from Linus' tree and commit:
899aba891cab ("RDMA/rxe: Fix FIXME in rxe_udp_encap_recv()")
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 12:10 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 2d3c72ed5041 ("rdma: Remove nes")
Yeah, not much you can do about tree wide patchsets conflicting with a
removal ;-)
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 12:06 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>
> between commit:
>
> dc1435c00fcd ("RDMA/srp: Rename SRP sysfs name after IB device
> rename trigger")
>
> from Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/Kconfig
drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/Makefile
between commit:
ec8f24b7faaf ("treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig")
from Linus' tree and commit:
2d3c72ed5041 ("rdma: Remove
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
between commit:
dc1435c00fcd ("RDMA/srp: Rename SRP sysfs name after IB device rename
trigger")
from Linus' tree and commit:
0e2d00eb6fd4 ("RDMA: Add NLDEV_GET_CHARDEV to allow char dev
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 13:00 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types_cq.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 6876aaedc8a1 ("RDMA/uverbs: Pass udata on
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_std_types_cq.c
between commit:
6876aaedc8a1 ("RDMA/uverbs: Pass udata on uverbs error unwind")
from Linus' tree and commit:
e39afe3d6dbd ("RDMA:
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:01 PM
> To: Doug Ledford ; Jason Gunthorpe
>
> Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List ; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List ; Parav Pandit
>
> Subject: linux-next: manual merge
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:01 PM
> To: Doug Ledford ; Jason Gunthorpe
>
> Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List ; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List ; Parav Pandit
>
> Subject: linux-next: manual merge
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c
between commit:
5c5702e259dc ("RDMA/core: Set right entry state before releasing reference")
from Linus' tree and commit:
43c7c851b9bc ("RDMA/core: Use dev_err/dbg/etc instead of pr_* +
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c
between commit:
5c5702e259dc ("RDMA/core: Set right entry state before releasing reference")
from Linus' tree and commit:
43c7c851b9bc ("RDMA/core: Use dev_err/dbg/etc instead of pr_* +
Hi Jason,
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 13:41:42 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> The resolution should end up like this:
>
> srcu_key = srcu_read_lock(>device->disassociate_srcu);
>
> if (!verify_command_mask(file, command, extended)) {
> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
Hi Jason,
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 13:41:42 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> The resolution should end up like this:
>
> srcu_key = srcu_read_lock(>device->disassociate_srcu);
>
> if (!verify_command_mask(file, command, extended)) {
> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:01:31PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 1eb9364ce81d ("IB/uverbs: Fix ordering of ucontext check in
> ib_uverbs_write")
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:01:31PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 1eb9364ce81d ("IB/uverbs: Fix ordering of ucontext check in
> ib_uverbs_write")
>
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
between commit:
1eb9364ce81d ("IB/uverbs: Fix ordering of ucontext check in ib_uverbs_write")
from Linus' tree and commit:
a9b66d6453d7 ("IB/uverbs: Do not block disassociate
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c
between commit:
1eb9364ce81d ("IB/uverbs: Fix ordering of ucontext check in ib_uverbs_write")
from Linus' tree and commit:
a9b66d6453d7 ("IB/uverbs: Do not block disassociate
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
between commit:
eeb66cdb6826 ("net/mlx5: Separate between E-Switch and MPFS")
from Linus' tree and commit:
c85023e153e3 ("IB/mlx5: Add raw ethernet local loopback
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c
between commit:
eeb66cdb6826 ("net/mlx5: Separate between E-Switch and MPFS")
from Linus' tree and commit:
c85023e153e3 ("IB/mlx5: Add raw ethernet local loopback
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:33:54AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> So, you need to take your pick. Do you want continuous development, or
> do you want me bending over backwards to try and avoid your company's
> endless stream of conflicts so Linus isn't yelling about that?
Doug,
You are mixing my
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:33:54AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> So, you need to take your pick. Do you want continuous development, or
> do you want me bending over backwards to try and avoid your company's
> endless stream of conflicts so Linus isn't yelling about that?
Doug,
You are mixing my
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 07:54 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:12:33AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 06:34 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000,
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 07:54 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:12:33AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 06:34 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 08:03:49AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 07:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:50:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky > > >
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 08:03:49AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 07:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:50:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 07:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:50:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry Doug, but it is not expected at all for the code
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 07:55 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:50:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry Doug, but it is not expected at all for the code which will
> > > go
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:50:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > Sorry Doug, but it is not expected at all for the code which will go to
> > 4.14.
> >
> > Both patches in question were targeted for
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:50:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > Sorry Doug, but it is not expected at all for the code which will go to
> > 4.14.
> >
> > Both patches in question were targeted for 4.13 and you was
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:12:33AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 06:34 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi Doug,
> > > >
> > > > Today's
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:12:33AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 06:34 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi Doug,
> > > >
> > > > Today's
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 06:34 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Doug,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 06:34 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Doug,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
> > >
> > >
Hi all,
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> Sorry Doug, but it is not expected at all for the code which will go to 4.14.
>
> Both patches in question were targeted for 4.13 and you was expected to
> see the merge conflicts during last month or so,
Hi all,
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:34:16 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> Sorry Doug, but it is not expected at all for the code which will go to 4.14.
>
> Both patches in question were targeted for 4.13 and you was expected to
> see the merge conflicts during last month or so, prior to merge
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
> >
> >
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
>
> between commit:
>
> d291f1a65232 ("IB/core: Enforce PKey security on QPs")
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
>
> between commit:
>
> d291f1a65232 ("IB/core: Enforce PKey security on QPs")
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
between commit:
d291f1a65232 ("IB/core: Enforce PKey security on QPs")
from Linus' tree and commits:
c7c0fb974caa ("IB/core: Introduce modify QP
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
between commit:
d291f1a65232 ("IB/core: Enforce PKey security on QPs")
from Linus' tree and commits:
c7c0fb974caa ("IB/core: Introduce modify QP
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
between commit:
002e062e13db ("IB/rxe: Fix handling of erroneous WR")
from Linus' tree and commit:
37f69f43fb5a ("IB/rxe: Hold refs when running tasklets")
from the rdma tree.
I
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
between commit:
002e062e13db ("IB/rxe: Fix handling of erroneous WR")
from Linus' tree and commit:
37f69f43fb5a ("IB/rxe: Hold refs when running tasklets")
from the rdma tree.
I
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/fw.c
include/linux/mlx4/device.h
between commit:
7c3d21c8153c ("net/mlx4_core: Preparation for VF vlan protocol 802.1ad")
from Linus' tree and commit:
fd10ed8e6f42 ("IB/mlx4: Fix
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/fw.c
include/linux/mlx4/device.h
between commit:
7c3d21c8153c ("net/mlx4_core: Preparation for VF vlan protocol 802.1ad")
from Linus' tree and commit:
fd10ed8e6f42 ("IB/mlx4: Fix
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
between commit:
0fbc81b3ad51 ("chcr/cxgb4i/cxgbit/RDMA/cxgb4: Allocate resources dynamically
for all cxgb4 ULD's")
from Linus' tree and commit:
086de575c142 ("cxgb4:
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
between commit:
0fbc81b3ad51 ("chcr/cxgb4i/cxgbit/RDMA/cxgb4: Allocate resources dynamically
for all cxgb4 ULD's")
from Linus' tree and commit:
086de575c142 ("cxgb4:
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_reg.h
between commit:
8ae7b8a59938 ("net: hns: fix sbm default parameters config error")
from Linus' tree and commit:
c80815c0b214 ("net: hns: Add reset function support
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_reg.h
between commit:
8ae7b8a59938 ("net: hns: fix sbm default parameters config error")
from Linus' tree and commit:
c80815c0b214 ("net: hns: Add reset function support
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
between commits:
a24274aa5c23 ("net: hns: add dsaf misc operation method")
f00ef863da2b ("net: hns: implement the miscellaneous operation by asl")
from Linus' tree
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_misc.c
between commits:
a24274aa5c23 ("net: hns: add dsaf misc operation method")
f00ef863da2b ("net: hns: implement the miscellaneous operation by asl")
from Linus' tree
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
MAINTAINERS
between commit:
b30d74e42d78 ("MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for hns driver")
from Linus' tree and commit:
dd778a9920a6 ("MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers for Hisilicon RoCE driver")
from the rdma tree.
I
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
MAINTAINERS
between commit:
b30d74e42d78 ("MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for hns driver")
from Linus' tree and commit:
dd778a9920a6 ("MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers for Hisilicon RoCE driver")
from the rdma tree.
I
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
between commit:
43a335e055bb ("net/mlx5_core: Flow counters infrastructure")
from Linus' tree and commit:
94c6825e0ff7 ("net/mlx5_core: Use tasklet for user-space CQ completion
events")
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
between commit:
43a335e055bb ("net/mlx5_core: Flow counters infrastructure")
from Linus' tree and commit:
94c6825e0ff7 ("net/mlx5_core: Use tasklet for user-space CQ completion
events")
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/verbs.c
between commit:
e1af35bc7942 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Use setup_timer")
from Linus' tree and commit:
045277cf1548 ("IB/qib,staging/rdma/hfi1: use setup_timer api")
from the rdma tree.
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/verbs.c
between commit:
e1af35bc7942 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Use setup_timer")
from Linus' tree and commit:
045277cf1548 ("IB/qib,staging/rdma/hfi1: use setup_timer api")
from the rdma tree.
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c
between commit:
7e43d4d25558 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Compress return logic")
from Linus' tree and commit:
0b091fb32c5a ("staging/hfi1: Enable TID caching feature")
from the rdma
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/user_pages.c
between commit:
7e43d4d25558 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Compress return logic")
from Linus' tree and commit:
0b091fb32c5a ("staging/hfi1: Enable TID caching feature")
from the rdma
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/keys.c
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/mr.c
between commits:
809487c70388 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Use DIV_ROUND_UP")
037f741673e0 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Do not use | with a variable with value
0")
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/keys.c
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/mr.c
between commits:
809487c70388 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Use DIV_ROUND_UP")
037f741673e0 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Do not use | with a variable with value
0")
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/mad.c
between commits:
a4fe1bc16411 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Remove casts of pointer to same type")
acc17d671c62 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Remove unnecessary parantheses")
from Linus' tree and
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/mad.c
between commits:
a4fe1bc16411 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Remove casts of pointer to same type")
acc17d671c62 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Remove unnecessary parantheses")
from Linus' tree and
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
between commit:
c91aed989694 ("svcrdma: handle rdma read with a non-zero initial page
offset")
from Linus' tree and commit:
412a15c0fe53 ("svcrdma: Port to new memory
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
between commit:
c91aed989694 ("svcrdma: handle rdma read with a non-zero initial page
offset")
from Linus' tree and commit:
412a15c0fe53 ("svcrdma: Port to new memory
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
between commit:
c91aed989694 ("svcrdma: handle rdma read with a non-zero initial page offset")
from Linus' tree and commit:
412a15c0fe53 ("svcrdma: Port to new memory
Hi Doug,
Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
between commit:
c91aed989694 ("svcrdma: handle rdma read with a non-zero initial page offset")
from Linus' tree and commit:
412a15c0fe53 ("svcrdma: Port to new memory
72 matches
Mail list logo