Hi Andy,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:02:27 -0700 Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I don't think that more cleanup is possible after all.
> do_audit_syscall_entry may not need to pass the arch parameter to the
> audit code, but it still needs it to choose the set of registers to
> use.
Yes, indeed, I did
Hi Andy,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:02:27 -0700 Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
I don't think that more cleanup is possible after all.
do_audit_syscall_entry may not need to pass the arch parameter to the
audit code, but it still needs it to choose the set of registers to
use.
Yes,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 ("ARCH: AUDIT:
> audit_syscall_entry() should not require the arch") from the audit tree
> and commit
On 14/09/24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S between commit b4f0d3755c5e ("audit: x86:
> drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface") from the audit tree
> and commit 1dcf74f6edfc ("x86_64, entry:
On 14/09/24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S between commit b4f0d3755c5e (audit: x86:
drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface) from the audit tree
and commit 1dcf74f6edfc (x86_64, entry: Use
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 (ARCH: AUDIT:
audit_syscall_entry() should not require the arch) from the audit tree
and
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
>> arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 ("ARCH: AUDIT:
>> audit_syscall_entry()
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 ("ARCH: AUDIT:
> audit_syscall_entry() should not require the arch") from the audit tree
> and commit
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 (ARCH: AUDIT:
audit_syscall_entry() should not require the arch) from the audit tree
and
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 (ARCH: AUDIT:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 ("ARCH: AUDIT:
audit_syscall_entry() should not require the arch") from the audit tree
and commit e0ffbaabc46d ("x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two
phases") from the tip
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S between commit b4f0d3755c5e ("audit: x86:
drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface") from the audit tree
and commit 1dcf74f6edfc ("x86_64, entry: Use split-phase
syscall_trace_enter for 64-bit
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S between commit b4f0d3755c5e (audit: x86:
drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface) from the audit tree
and commit 1dcf74f6edfc (x86_64, entry: Use split-phase
syscall_trace_enter for 64-bit
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c between commit 91397401bb50 (ARCH: AUDIT:
audit_syscall_entry() should not require the arch) from the audit tree
and commit e0ffbaabc46d (x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two
phases) from the tip tree.
14 matches
Mail list logo