Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-08-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:28:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h > > between commit: > > d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h") > (also "crypto: x86 - Put back integer

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h between commit: d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h") (also "crypto: x86 - Put back integer parts of include/asm/inst.h" which I have added to the crypto tree merge today)

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-20 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 09:31:18AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer > parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree. Sorry but you can't send a patch without changing the Subject line as otherwise patchwork will simply

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Uros, On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:13:51 +0200 Uros Bizjak wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:03 AM Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer > > > parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree. > > > > The tip tree

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-20 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:03 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer > > parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree. > > The tip tree change needs the XMM parts kept as well, sorry. Strange, because I did test my patch

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Uros, On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:31:18 +0200 Uros Bizjak wrote: > > Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer > parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree. The tip tree change needs the XMM parts kept as well, sorry. So I ended up just removing the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-17 Thread Uros Bizjak
Please find attached the incremental patch that puts back integer parts of inst.h. This resolves the conflict with the tip tree. Uros. On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:45 AM Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:27:27AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > > > I will prepare a v2 that leaves

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Herbert, On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:44:01 +1000 Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:27:27AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > > > I will prepare a v2 that leaves needed part of inst.h. > > Your patch has already been applied. So please make it an > incremental patch. Thank you

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-17 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:27:27AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > I will prepare a v2 that leaves needed part of inst.h. Your patch has already been applied. So please make it an incremental patch. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-17 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 6:47 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h > > between commit: > > d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h") > > from the crypto tree and commit: > >

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h between commit: d7866e503bdc ("crypto: x86 - Remove include/asm/inst.h") from the crypto tree and commit: eaad981291ee ("x86/entry/64: Introduce the FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro") from the tip

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2017-11-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: drivers/crypto/mv_cesa.c between commit: 27b43fd95b14 ("crypto: marvell - Remove the old mv_cesa driver") from the crypto tree and commit: f34d8d506eef ("crypto: Convert timers to use timer_setup()") from the tip

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2017-11-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: drivers/crypto/mv_cesa.c between commit: 27b43fd95b14 ("crypto: marvell - Remove the old mv_cesa driver") from the crypto tree and commit: f34d8d506eef ("crypto: Convert timers to use timer_setup()") from the tip

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2015-10-12 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:24:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/Makefile > > between commit: > > e38b6b7fcfd1 ("crypto: x86/sha - Add build support for Intel SHA Extensions > optimized SHA1 and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2015-10-12 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 02:24:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/Makefile > > between commit: > > e38b6b7fcfd1 ("crypto: x86/sha - Add build support for Intel SHA Extensions > optimized SHA1 and

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2015-10-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/Makefile between commit: e38b6b7fcfd1 ("crypto: x86/sha - Add build support for Intel SHA Extensions optimized SHA1 and SHA256") from the crypto tree and commit: 7b956f035a9e ("x86/asm: Re-add parts of the

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2015-10-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/Makefile between commit: e38b6b7fcfd1 ("crypto: x86/sha - Add build support for Intel SHA Extensions optimized SHA1 and SHA256") from the crypto tree and commit: 7b956f035a9e ("x86/asm: Re-add parts of the

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in: drivers/crypto/vmx/aes.c drivers/crypto/vmx/aes_cbc.c drivers/crypto/vmx/ghash.c between commit: 4beb10604597 "crypto: vmx - Reindent to kernel style" from the crypto tree and commit: 5f76eea88dcb "sched/preempt,

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the crypto tree

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in: drivers/crypto/vmx/aes.c drivers/crypto/vmx/aes_cbc.c drivers/crypto/vmx/ghash.c between commit: 4beb10604597 crypto: vmx - Reindent to kernel style from the crypto tree and commit: 5f76eea88dcb sched/preempt,