Hi,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:09:21PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c ("f_fs:
> > >
> > > I can't find this commit on linux-usb. In fact, googling for it the
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:12:26PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:34:00AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Felipe,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:34:00AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Felipe,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:34:00AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Felipe,
Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c (f_fs:
I
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:12:26PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:34:00AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Felipe,
Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:09:21PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c (f_fs:
I can't find this commit on linux-usb. In fact, googling for it the only
reference
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c ("f_fs:
I can't find this commit on linux-usb. In fact, googling for it the only
On 09/17/2014 08:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c ("f_fs:
> saner API for ffs_sb_create_file()") from the vfs tree and commit
> 1b0bf88fd8b8 ("usb:
Hi Felipe,
Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c ("f_fs:
saner API for ffs_sb_create_file()") from the vfs tree and commit
1b0bf88fd8b8 ("usb: gadget: f_fs: virtual endpoint address mapping")
from the
Hi Felipe,
Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c (f_fs:
saner API for ffs_sb_create_file()) from the vfs tree and commit
1b0bf88fd8b8 (usb: gadget: f_fs: virtual endpoint address mapping)
from the
On 09/17/2014 08:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Felipe,
Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c (f_fs:
saner API for ffs_sb_create_file()) from the vfs tree and commit
1b0bf88fd8b8 (usb: gadget:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Felipe,
Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c between commit 8322215aa91c (f_fs:
I can't find this commit on linux-usb. In fact, googling for it the only
12 matches
Mail list logo