Hi Eric,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:43 -0500 Eric Paris wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:41 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > fsnotify: rebased to v3.6(!) to resolve a conflict.
> > git://git.infradead.org/users/eparis/notify.git#for-next
>
> I planned to let it sit in -next until
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:41 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> I am not sure how much you care about this, but here is a list of the
> trees in linux-next that have been rebased in the last day (i.e. since I
> fetched the trees for next-20121211):
>
> fsnotify: rebased to v3.6(!) to
Hi Linus,
I am not sure how much you care about this, but here is a list of the
trees in linux-next that have been rebased in the last day (i.e. since I
fetched the trees for next-20121211):
fsnotify: rebased to v3.6(!) to resolve a conflict.
Hi Linus,
I am not sure how much you care about this, but here is a list of the
trees in linux-next that have been rebased in the last day (i.e. since I
fetched the trees for next-20121211):
fsnotify: rebased to v3.6(!) to resolve a conflict.
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:41 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Linus,
I am not sure how much you care about this, but here is a list of the
trees in linux-next that have been rebased in the last day (i.e. since I
fetched the trees for next-20121211):
fsnotify: rebased to v3.6(!) to resolve
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:43 -0500 Eric Paris epa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:41 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
fsnotify: rebased to v3.6(!) to resolve a conflict.
git://git.infradead.org/users/eparis/notify.git#for-next
I planned to let it sit in -next
6 matches
Mail list logo
