On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 23:27 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:46:02 -0500
> "Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Hi Justin,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the report.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
> > >
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 23:27 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Justin,
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:46:02 -0500
Justin M. Forbes jfor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the report.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
Hi Justin,
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:46:02 -0500
"Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > Thanks for the report.
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
> > "Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
> >
> > > The block-mq conversion for loop in
Hi Justin,
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:46:02 -0500
Justin M. Forbes jfor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the report.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
Justin M. Forbes jfor...@redhat.com wrote:
The block-mq
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Justin M. Forbes
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
>> "Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
>>
>> > The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0 kernels is showing us an
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Justin M. Forbes
jfor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the report.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
Justin M. Forbes jfor...@redhat.com wrote:
The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
> "Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
>
> > The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0 kernels is showing us an
> > interesting scalability problem with live CDs (ro, squashfs).
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:59 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the report.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
Justin M. Forbes jfor...@redhat.com wrote:
The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0 kernels is showing us an
interesting scalability problem with live CDs (ro,
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the report.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
"Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
> The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0 kernels is showing us an
> interesting scalability problem with live CDs (ro, squashfs). It was
> noticed when testing the Fedora beta that the more CPUs a
The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0 kernels is showing us an
interesting scalability problem with live CDs (ro, squashfs). It was
noticed when testing the Fedora beta that the more CPUs a liveCD image
was given, the slower it would boot. A 4 core qemu instance or bare
metal instance took more
The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0 kernels is showing us an
interesting scalability problem with live CDs (ro, squashfs). It was
noticed when testing the Fedora beta that the more CPUs a liveCD image
was given, the slower it would boot. A 4 core qemu instance or bare
metal instance took more
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the report.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:04:10 -0500
Justin M. Forbes jfor...@redhat.com wrote:
The block-mq conversion for loop in 4.0 kernels is showing us an
interesting scalability problem with live CDs (ro, squashfs). It was
noticed when testing the Fedora beta that the
12 matches
Mail list logo