Le 05-Jun-2001, Andrew Morton écrivait :
> Some video cards have a PCI cheat-mode in which they keep
> the PCI bus busy until they are ready to accept new
> commands, rather forcing a retry. Figures of up to
> twenty milliseconds have been mentioned. Your X server
> *may* support the
Le 05-Jun-2001, Andrew Morton écrivait :
Some video cards have a PCI cheat-mode in which they keep
the PCI bus busy until they are ready to accept new
commands, rather forcing a retry. Figures of up to
twenty milliseconds have been mentioned. Your X server
*may* support the `PCIRetry'
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, safemode wrote:
> this is just a general question about low latency patches on 2.2, I
> remember hearing about low latency patches for 2.4 not playing well with X
> 4.x, is this true for 2.2 low latency patches as well?
>
Not sure. My testing uses XFree86 3.3.6.
Wm
safemode wrote:
>
> this is just a general question about low latency patches on 2.2, I
> remember hearing about low latency patches for 2.4 not playing well with X
> 4.x, is this true for 2.2 low latency patches as well?
Yes, it would be the case.
Some video cards have a PCI cheat-mode in
this is just a general question about low latency patches on 2.2, I
remember hearing about low latency patches for 2.4 not playing well with X
4.x, is this true for 2.2 low latency patches as well?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:38:34AM -0400, William Montgomery wrote:
> > Anyone have any ideas?
>
> Which options did you enabled? In theory the ikd patch could only make
> the latency worse ;), there are no performance improvements in it but
>
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:38:34AM -0400, William Montgomery wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas?
Which options did you enabled? In theory the ikd patch could only make
the latency worse ;), there are no performance improvements in it but
only runtime debugging stuff.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:38:34AM -0400, William Montgomery wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
Which options did you enabled? In theory the ikd patch could only make
the latency worse ;), there are no performance improvements in it but
only runtime debugging stuff.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:38:34AM -0400, William Montgomery wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
Which options did you enabled? In theory the ikd patch could only make
the latency worse ;), there are no performance improvements in it but
only
this is just a general question about low latency patches on 2.2, I
remember hearing about low latency patches for 2.4 not playing well with X
4.x, is this true for 2.2 low latency patches as well?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
safemode wrote:
this is just a general question about low latency patches on 2.2, I
remember hearing about low latency patches for 2.4 not playing well with X
4.x, is this true for 2.2 low latency patches as well?
Yes, it would be the case.
Some video cards have a PCI cheat-mode in which
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, safemode wrote:
this is just a general question about low latency patches on 2.2, I
remember hearing about low latency patches for 2.4 not playing well with X
4.x, is this true for 2.2 low latency patches as well?
Not sure. My testing uses XFree86 3.3.6.
Wm
-
I am testing Ingo's lowlatency patch on the 2.2.19 kernel and have
a strange problem. I applied the most recent patch I could find,
lowlatency-2.2.16-A0 and fixed a few failed hunks. The kernel appears
stable after many (~24) hours of stress testing with Benno's latencytest
suite and others.
I am testing Ingo's lowlatency patch on the 2.2.19 kernel and have
a strange problem. I applied the most recent patch I could find,
lowlatency-2.2.16-A0 and fixed a few failed hunks. The kernel appears
stable after many (~24) hours of stress testing with Benno's latencytest
suite and others.
14 matches
Mail list logo
