Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > mplayer is useful for testing... but that one already works (after you > > > > setup the pipeline, and configure exposure/gain). > > > > > > > > But thats useful for testing, not really for production. Image will be > > > > out of focus and with wrong white balance. > > > > > > > >

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > mplayer is useful for testing... but that one already works (after you > > > > setup the pipeline, and configure exposure/gain). > > > > > > > > But thats useful for testing, not really for production. Image will be > > > > out of focus and with wrong white balance. > > > > > > > >

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philippe De Muyter
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:01:56AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:47 +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > > > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philippe De Muyter
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:01:56AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:47 +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > > > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:47 +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > > > > I would say: camorama,

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:47 +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > > > > I would say: camorama,

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philippe De Muyter
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > > > > with those, it

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philippe De Muyter
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > > > > with those, it

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > > > with those, it will likely run with any other application. > > > > > > > I would like

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-16 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > > > with those, it will likely run with any other application. > > > > > > > I would like

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:04:21 +0100 Pavel Machek escreveu: > Hi! > > > > Well, I believe first question is: what applications would we want to > > > run on complex devices? Will sending control from video to subdevs > > > actually help? > > > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3,

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:04:21 +0100 Pavel Machek escreveu: > Hi! > > > > Well, I believe first question is: what applications would we want to > > > run on complex devices? Will sending control from video to subdevs > > > actually help? > > > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > > with those, it will likely run with any other application. > > > > I would like to add the 'v4l2src' plugin of gstreamer, and on the > imx6 its While

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > > with those, it will likely run with any other application. > > > > I would like to add the 'v4l2src' plugin of gstreamer, and on the > imx6 its While

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Well, I believe first question is: what applications would we want to > > run on complex devices? Will sending control from video to subdevs > > actually help? > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > with those, it will likely run with any other

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Well, I believe first question is: what applications would we want to > > run on complex devices? Will sending control from video to subdevs > > actually help? > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > with those, it will likely run with any other

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Philippe De Muyter
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 09:54:31PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:32:54 +0100 > Pavel Machek escreveu: > > > > > Well, I believe first question is: what applications would we want to > > run on complex devices? Will sending control from video to

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-15 Thread Philippe De Muyter
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 09:54:31PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:32:54 +0100 > Pavel Machek escreveu: > > > > > Well, I believe first question is: what applications would we want to > > run on complex devices? Will sending control from video to subdevs > >

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:32:54 +0100 Pavel Machek escreveu: > Hi! > > > > > Even if they were merged, if we keep the same mean time to develop a > > > > libv4l plugin, that would mean that a plugin for i.MX6 could take 2-3 > > > > years to be developed. > > > > > > > > There's a

Re: media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:32:54 +0100 Pavel Machek escreveu: > Hi! > > > > > Even if they were merged, if we keep the same mean time to develop a > > > > libv4l plugin, that would mean that a plugin for i.MX6 could take 2-3 > > > > years to be developed. > > > > > > > > There's a clear message on

media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Even if they were merged, if we keep the same mean time to develop a > > > libv4l plugin, that would mean that a plugin for i.MX6 could take 2-3 > > > years to be developed. > > > > > > There's a clear message on it: > > > - we shouldn't keep pushing for a solution via libv4l. > >

media / v4l2-mc: wishlist for complex cameras (was Re: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline)

2017-03-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Even if they were merged, if we keep the same mean time to develop a > > > libv4l plugin, that would mean that a plugin for i.MX6 could take 2-3 > > > years to be developed. > > > > > > There's a clear message on it: > > > - we shouldn't keep pushing for a solution via libv4l. > >