Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-27 Thread Tyler Baker
Hi Pavel, On 26 April 2015 at 03:20, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit >> > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. >> > >> > Any ideas? >> >> Looks like DT and legacy booting a

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-27 Thread Tyler Baker
Hi Pavel, On 26 April 2015 at 03:20, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote: Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas? Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our labs. [0][1] Interesting web pages

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit > > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. > > > > Any ideas? > > Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our > labs. [0][1] Interesting web pages, thanks. I noticed that lega

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-26 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2015-04-16 09:35:54, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Marc Zyngier [150416 02:38]: > > On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit > > > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas? Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our labs. [0][1] Interesting web pages, thanks. I noticed that legacy booting indicates broken today

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-26 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2015-04-16 09:35:54, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com [150416 02:38]: On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Tyler Baker
On 16 April 2015 at 02:32, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. > > Any ideas? Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Marc Zyngier [150416 02:38]: > On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit > > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. > > > > Any ideas? > > To such a question, the only a

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. > > Any ideas? To such a question, the only answer I have is "Yes". For a more useful reply, I'm afraid you'll h

n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http

n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas? To such a question, the only answer I have is Yes. For a more useful reply, I'm afraid you'll have to ask a better question

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Tyler Baker
On 16 April 2015 at 02:32, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote: Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas? Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our labs. [0][1

Re: n900 in 4.1-rc0

2015-04-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com [150416 02:38]: On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken. Any ideas? To such a question, the only answer I have is Yes. For a more useful