Hi Pavel,
On 26 April 2015 at 03:20, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
>> > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
>> >
>> > Any ideas?
>>
>> Looks like DT and legacy booting a
Hi Pavel,
On 26 April 2015 at 03:20, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas?
Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our
labs. [0][1]
Interesting web pages
Hi!
> > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
> > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our
> labs. [0][1]
Interesting web pages, thanks.
I noticed that lega
On Thu 2015-04-16 09:35:54, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Marc Zyngier [150416 02:38]:
> > On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
> > > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas?
Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our
labs. [0][1]
Interesting web pages, thanks.
I noticed that legacy booting indicates broken today
On Thu 2015-04-16 09:35:54, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com [150416 02:38]:
On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas
On 16 April 2015 at 02:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
> 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
>
> Any ideas?
Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine
* Marc Zyngier [150416 02:38]:
> On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
> > 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> To such a question, the only a
On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
> 34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
>
> Any ideas?
To such a question, the only answer I have is "Yes".
For a more useful reply, I'm afraid you'll h
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http
On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas?
To such a question, the only answer I have is Yes.
For a more useful reply, I'm afraid you'll have to ask a better question
On 16 April 2015 at 02:32, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas?
Looks like DT and legacy booting are working fine in our labs. [0][1
* Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com [150416 02:38]:
On 16/04/15 10:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Just tried booting 4.1-rc0 on n900 (commit
34c9a0ffc75ad25b6a60f61e27c4a4b1189b8085) and it is broken.
Any ideas?
To such a question, the only answer I have is Yes.
For a more useful
14 matches
Mail list logo