On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:16:11 +0100 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
> > > > toward at the power
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:16:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
> > > > toward at the power management
On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
> > > toward at the power management summit several years ago
> > > (hal/pm-utils) then, yes.
> >
> > I must
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
> > toward at the power management summit several years ago
> > (hal/pm-utils) then, yes.
>
> I must have been on different summit... I believe it is bad to tie
>
On Tue 2008-02-26 12:46:13, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Andrew is trying to get s2ram to work on Fedora:
> >
> > > > > Please try s2ram, there's good chance it will just work.
> > > >
> > > > configure: error: Required
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Andrew is trying to get s2ram to work on Fedora:
>
> > > > Please try s2ram, there's good chance it will just work.
> > >
> > > configure: error: Required libx86 was not found
> >
> > apt-get install libx86-dev?
Hi!
Andrew is trying to get s2ram to work on Fedora:
> > > Please try s2ram, there's good chance it will just work.
> >
> > configure: error: Required libx86 was not found
>
> apt-get install libx86-dev?
>
> Alternatively, can you post dmidecode? Thinkpads usually work with
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:46:11 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> > such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
> > and
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:46:11 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts
Hi!
Andrew is trying to get s2ram to work on Fedora:
Please try s2ram, there's good chance it will just work.
configure: error: Required libx86 was not found
apt-get install libx86-dev?
Alternatively, can you post dmidecode? Thinkpads usually work with
acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode ;
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Andrew is trying to get s2ram to work on Fedora:
Please try s2ram, there's good chance it will just work.
configure: error: Required libx86 was not found
apt-get install libx86-dev?
On Tue 2008-02-26 12:46:13, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Andrew is trying to get s2ram to work on Fedora:
Please try s2ram, there's good chance it will just work.
configure: error: Required libx86 was not found
On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
toward at the power management summit several years ago
(hal/pm-utils) then, yes.
I must have been on
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
toward at the power management summit several years ago
(hal/pm-utils) then, yes.
I must have been on different summit... I believe it is bad to tie
s2ram to
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:16:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
toward at the power management summit several
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:16:11 +0100 Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
toward at the power management summit
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean suspend-to-ram works correctly on your
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Attached is the acpidump output run under 2.6.23-rc3 + with reverted
> > 37f9b4c7c612fcbeb8fb6faddaef4ccdb5350145
> > (IOW - this is a working configuration).
> Thanks, you've got round 10100 bug number.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:48:12 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200
Hi!
> > > > Maybe it doesn't. Andrew saw the autoresume on -rc[2,3]
> > >
> > > And earlier - I think 2.6.23 does it as well.
> >
> > But that one at least resumes fine, does it not?
>
> Nope, the resume-after-five-seconds and black-screen-after-resume have
> always been there (I've only had
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:48:12 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > Hmm, mystery partly
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > Hmm, mystery partly solved... as you guessed it, this piece of code
> > > was not in my tree.
> > >
> > > (still, how
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hmm, mystery partly solved... as you guessed it, this piece of code
> > was not in my tree.
> >
> > (still, how can this cause autoresume after 5 seconds is a mystery to
> > me).
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
> > > > > > Author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
> I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a
On Mon 2008-02-25 16:32:38, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
>>> Author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
>>>
>>> power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
>>
>> This is pretty
Hi!
> > > > > commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
> > > > > Author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
> > > > >
> > > > > power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
> > > >
> > > > This is pretty unlikely to be
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> > > > commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
> > > > Author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
> > > >
> > > > power_state: get rid of
Hi!
> > > commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
> > > Author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
> > >
> > > power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
> >
> > This is pretty unlikely to be it. Can you double check that this
Pavel Machek wrote:
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
This is pretty unlikely to be it. Can you double check that this patch
really breaks
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> > On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S.
Hi!
> On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi
On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a bug report,
I can do it for you. You only need to provide acpidump.
and attach acpidump?
I'll see if I can
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> > such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> > such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> > such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
> > and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
> such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
> and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
You
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in /var/log/acpid
after power on:
[Mon Feb
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in /var/log/acpid
after power on:
[Mon Feb
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
You mean
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a bug report,
I can do it for you. You only need to provide acpidump.
and attach acpidump?
I'll see if I can
On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as
Hi!
On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Pavel Machek wrote:
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
This is pretty unlikely to be it. Can you double check that this patch
really breaks
Hi!
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
This is pretty unlikely to be it. Can you double check that this patch
really
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
Hi!
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
This is pretty unlikely to be it. Can you double check that this
On Mon 2008-02-25 16:32:38, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable in SATA
This is pretty unlikely to be it. Can you
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a bug
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
commit 559bbe6cbd0d8c68d40076a5f7dc98e3bf5864b2
Author: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Feb 21 13:56:55 2008 +0100
power_state: get rid of write-only variable
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm, mystery partly solved... as you guessed it, this piece of code
was not in my tree.
(still, how can this cause autoresume after 5 seconds is a mystery to
me).
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:48:12 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm, mystery partly solved... as you guessed it,
Hi!
Maybe it doesn't. Andrew saw the autoresume on -rc[2,3]
And earlier - I think 2.6.23 does it as well.
But that one at least resumes fine, does it not?
Nope, the resume-after-five-seconds and black-screen-after-resume have
always been there (I've only had the thing a few
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:48:12 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm, mystery partly solved... as you guessed it, this piece of code
was not in my tree.
(still, how can this cause
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Alexey Starikovskiy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is the acpidump output run under 2.6.23-rc3 + with reverted
37f9b4c7c612fcbeb8fb6faddaef4ccdb5350145
(IOW - this is a working configuration).
Thanks, you've got round 10100 bug number.
Please
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean suspend-to-ram works correctly on your t61p?
64 matches
Mail list logo
