On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:54:59 +0300, Mika Westerberg said:
> Can you check if the patch fixes the issue?
Tested, no complaints at boot, and everything seems to be working.
Feel free to add this to the patch and send it upstream:
Tested-By: Valdis Kletnieks
> -8<-8<-8<-8<-8<
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:12:48AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:37:42PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Lukas, Mika]
> > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:36:02PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> > > Seen during boot on next-20160517. This apparently sneaked into t
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:37:42PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Lukas, Mika]
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:36:02PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> > Seen during boot on next-20160517. This apparently sneaked into the tree
> > sometime after -0502 (probably after -0512 but I can't prove i
[+cc Lukas, Mika]
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:36:02PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> Seen during boot on next-20160517. This apparently sneaked into the tree
> sometime after -0502 (probably after -0512 but I can't prove it at the moment)
>
> [1.806765] INFO: trying to register non-static ke
Seen during boot on next-20160517. This apparently sneaked into the tree
sometime after -0502 (probably after -0512 but I can't prove it at the moment)
[1.806765] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[1.806772] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[1.806777] turning off t
5 matches
Mail list logo