RE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread YhLu
Yes. should not use prink(ERR YH > -Original Message- > From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:22 PM > To: YhLu > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken > > On Wed, Feb 16,

Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0800, YhLu wrote: > forget about it. I found the reason: I only put node 0 has RAM installed. There is some problem with this code - it complains on a few machines. However it's relatively harmless when this happens, so I haven't looked it yet. Should perhaps

RE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread YhLu
forget about it. I found the reason: I only put node 0 has RAM installed. YH > -Original Message- > From: YhLu > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:40 PM > To: Andi Kleen > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken > > I add

node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread YhLu
I add some printk in k8_bus.c node id = 0, node_to_cpumask = f i= 0 ldtbus = 0 i= 1 ldtbus = 40100 i= 2 ldtbus = 0 node id = 1, node_to_cpumask = 0 i= 0 ldtbus = 0 i= 1 ldtbus = 0 i= 2 ldtbus = 70500 node id = 2, node_to_cpumask = 0 i= 0 ldtbus = 0 i= 1 ldtbus = 0 i= 2 ldtbus = 0 node id = 3,

node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread YhLu
I add some printk in k8_bus.c node id = 0, node_to_cpumask = f i= 0 ldtbus = 0 i= 1 ldtbus = 40100 i= 2 ldtbus = 0 node id = 1, node_to_cpumask = 0 i= 0 ldtbus = 0 i= 1 ldtbus = 0 i= 2 ldtbus = 70500 node id = 2, node_to_cpumask = 0 i= 0 ldtbus = 0 i= 1 ldtbus = 0 i= 2 ldtbus = 0 node id = 3,

RE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread YhLu
forget about it. I found the reason: I only put node 0 has RAM installed. YH -Original Message- From: YhLu Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:40 PM To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken I add some printk in k8_bus.c node

Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0800, YhLu wrote: forget about it. I found the reason: I only put node 0 has RAM installed. There is some problem with this code - it complains on a few machines. However it's relatively harmless when this happens, so I haven't looked it yet. Should perhaps

RE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

2005-02-16 Thread YhLu
Yes. should not use prink(ERR YH -Original Message- From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:22 PM To: YhLu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0800, YhLu