On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:38:16 -0400 Benjamin LaHaise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Hmm, after a opcontrol --reset i see the same issue now. Don't know what's
> > wrong, but it must be something different from the .20 perfctr
On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:38:16 -0400 Benjamin LaHaise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Hmm, after a opcontrol --reset i see the same issue now. Don't know what's
wrong, but it must be something different from the .20 perfctr allocation
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hmm, after a opcontrol --reset i see the same issue now. Don't know what's
> wrong, but it must be something different from the .20 perfctr allocation
> problem.
>
> It looks like the daemon doesn't get any data from the kernel
I
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Hmm, after a opcontrol --reset i see the same issue now. Don't know what's
wrong, but it must be something different from the .20 perfctr allocation
problem.
It looks like the daemon doesn't get any data from the kernel
I finally
4 matches
Mail list logo
